Oakeshott’s pedagogic philosophy and the “omission of passion” in political science education

The political science undergraduate curriculum is often organized around providing students with professional preparation, skill-building, and civic training. These three aims, while timely and useful to the student populations they serve, often overlook both important ends of a college education and the unique features of a political science program. We argue that political philosopher Michael Oakeshott’s reflections on the meaning, purposes, and characteristics of education facilitate a restructuring of the curriculum that may help political science educators revitalize and engage their students today. We discuss Oakeshott’s work on both political education and university education, highlighting the attributes of his educational philosophy most relevant for educators today. We conclude with solutions for modern educators that accord with this philosophy, offering recommendations for how teachers of both theory and empirics can intentionally incorporate a pedagogical approach that centers the needs of today’s students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2026.2716101
Primary Topic
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oakeshott’s pedagogic philosophy and the “omission of passion” in political science education

S. F. Wise, Michael Scholwinski
Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
article

Oakeshott’s pedagogic philosophy and the “omission of passion” in political science education

S. F. Wise, Michael Scholwinski
article en

Abstract

The political science undergraduate curriculum is often organized around providing students with professional preparation, skill-building, and civic training. These three aims, while timely and useful to the student populations they serve, often overlook both important ends of a college education and the unique features of a political science program. We argue that political philosopher Michael Oakeshott’s reflections on the meaning, purposes, and characteristics of education facilitate a restructuring of the curriculum that may help political science educators revitalize and engage their students today. We discuss Oakeshott’s work on both political education and university education, highlighting the attributes of his educational philosophy most relevant for educators today. We conclude with solutions for modern educators that accord with this philosophy, offering recommendations for how teachers of both theory and empirics can intentionally incorporate a pedagogical approach that centers the needs of today’s students.

Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy
University of North Texas (US), Institute of Behavioral Sciences (JP)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.