Psychological Distress Among Primary Care Professionals in Singapore: Repeated-Measures Analyses of Two Independent Observation Windows (HADS and GHQ-12)

Background: Healthcare professionals in Singapore’s primary care face sustained workload pressures and increasing complexity. Grounded in the Job Demands–Resources model, this study identifies demographic, clinical, and lifestyle factors associated with psychological distress among staff across two independent windows spanning the pre- and post-pandemic periods. Methods: The study was conducted among staff in National University Polyclinics (NUP) Singapore. De-identified health screening data included demographics, occupation, clinical measures, medical history, and lifestyle behaviours. Primary outcome was psychological distress, assessed across 2 distinct observation windows: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from 2018–2022 (abnormal ≥ 8) and the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) from 2023–2025 (abnormal ≥ 2). Multivariate mixed-effects logistic regression identified factors associated with psychological distress while accounting for within-person clustering. Results: We analysed 3307 screening visits from 1260 staff. Within the HADS observation window (2018–2022), abnormal scores were significantly higher in 2022 compared with 2018 (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.64–3.17). Within the GHQ-12 observation window (2023–2025), a non-significant decline in abnormal scores was observed. Older age (2018–2022: OR 0.967, 95% CI 0.948–0.987; 2023–2025: OR 0.955, 95% CI 0.928–0.983) and regular exercise (2018–2022: OR 0.724, 95% CI 0.529–0.991; 2023–2025: OR 0.357, 95% CI 0.231–0.551) were consistently associated with lower odds of distress. Medical staff had significantly lower odds of distress compared to ancillary staff in 2018–2022 (OR 0.391, 95% CI 0.207–0.739). Regular alcohol use was associated with higher distress in 2018–2022 (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.05–2.31), while active smoking (OR 5.79, 95% CI 1.75–19.10) and family history of chronic disease (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.28–3.87) were significant in 2023–2025. Conclusions: Older age and regular exercise were consistently associated with lower odds of psychological distress across both windows, while ancillary staff and alcohol use (HADS window), and smoking and family history of chronic disease (GHQ-12 window) were period-specific determinants. These findings support the implementation of proactive, targeted wellness initiatives alongside the routine mental health surveillance among primary care staff.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14182947
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Psychological Distress Among Primary Care Professionals in Singapore: Repeated-Measures Analyses of Two Independent Observation Windows (HADS and GHQ-12)

Thomas Soo, Sky Wei Chee Koh, Howard Bauchner, Alicia Ying Ying Boo et al.
Healthcare
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
article

Psychological Distress Among Primary Care Professionals in Singapore: Repeated-Measures Analyses of Two Independent Observation Windows (HADS and GHQ-12)

Thomas Soo, Sky Wei Chee Koh, Howard Bauchner, Alicia Ying Ying Boo, Lynette Mei Lim Goh, Si Hui Low, Yii Jen Lew, Yixuan Chuah
article en

Abstract

Background: Healthcare professionals in Singapore’s primary care face sustained workload pressures and increasing complexity. Grounded in the Job Demands–Resources model, this study identifies demographic, clinical, and lifestyle factors associated with psychological distress among staff across two independent windows spanning the pre- and post-pandemic periods. Methods: The study was conducted among staff in National University Polyclinics (NUP) Singapore. De-identified health screening data included demographics, occupation, clinical measures, medical history, and lifestyle behaviours. Primary outcome was psychological distress, assessed across 2 distinct observation windows: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from 2018–2022 (abnormal ≥ 8) and the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) from 2023–2025 (abnormal ≥ 2). Multivariate mixed-effects logistic regression identified factors associated with psychological distress while accounting for within-person clustering. Results: We analysed 3307 screening visits from 1260 staff. Within the HADS observation window (2018–2022), abnormal scores were significantly higher in 2022 compared with 2018 (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.64–3.17). Within the GHQ-12 observation window (2023–2025), a non-significant decline in abnormal scores was observed. Older age (2018–2022: OR 0.967, 95% CI 0.948–0.987; 2023–2025: OR 0.955, 95% CI 0.928–0.983) and regular exercise (2018–2022: OR 0.724, 95% CI 0.529–0.991; 2023–2025: OR 0.357, 95% CI 0.231–0.551) were consistently associated with lower odds of distress. Medical staff had significantly lower odds of distress compared to ancillary staff in 2018–2022 (OR 0.391, 95% CI 0.207–0.739). Regular alcohol use was associated with higher distress in 2018–2022 (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.05–2.31), while active smoking (OR 5.79, 95% CI 1.75–19.10) and family history of chronic disease (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.28–3.87) were significant in 2023–2025. Conclusions: Older age and regular exercise were consistently associated with lower odds of psychological distress across both windows, while ancillary staff and alcohol use (HADS window), and smoking and family history of chronic disease (GHQ-12 window) were period-specific determinants. These findings support the implementation of proactive, targeted wellness initiatives alongside the routine mental health surveillance among primary care staff.

HealthcareVol. 14(18)
Boston University (US), National University of Singapore (SG), Nanyang Technological University (SG), Ng Teng Fong General Hospital (SG), National University Health System (SG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.