Evaluation of a Web-Based Silica Exposure Risk Assessment Tool in Construction: Data Appraisal and User Trial

Background: Respirable crystalline silica (RCS) presents persistent health risks in construction, and predictive exposure models offer a potential complement to traditional monitoring. This study evaluated the applicability of the British Columbia Construction Safety Alliance (BCCSA) Silica Control ToolTM for use in the construction sector in Victoria, Australia. Methods: A two-phase evaluation was undertaken. First, a desktop interrogation of the Tool’s underpinning data, statistical model development and documented limitations was performed, including statistical review. Second, a user trial was conducted with 12 Victorian industry stakeholders who completed realistic task scenarios within the Tool and generated Exposure Control Plans (ECPs). Qualitative feedback was obtained through observation and focus group discussion. Results: The interrogation demonstrated that the Tool is built on a large, iteratively improved North American exposure database, with well developed and statistically sound modelling framework; however, its predictive validity has not yet been independently evaluated using Australian exposure data. Stakeholders produced 14 ECPs across diverse silica-generating tasks, showing that the Tool responded sensitively to changes in task parameters and control selections. Thematic analysis identified five key themes: usability, regulatory alignment, clarity of terminology, gaps in task representation, and adherence to the hierarchy of controls. Participants saw strong potential for the Tool but emphasised the need for Australian data integration, clearer definitions, enhanced usability, and localised terminology. Conclusions: The BCCSA Silica Control ToolTM demonstrates a technically robust North American modelling framework and strong stakeholder acceptability, but Australian-specific validation and adaptation are required before adoption in Victoria. Incorporating Australian exposure data, tailoring terminology and ensuring alignment with local legislation are critical next steps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Work and Health
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53941/wah.2026.100021
Primary Topic
Occupational and environmental lung diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluation of a Web-Based Silica Exposure Risk Assessment Tool in Construction: Data Appraisal and User Trial

Sharyn Gaskin, Len Turczynowicz, Chandnee Ramkissoon, Yonatal Tefera et al.
Work and Health
Occupational and environmental lung diseases
article

Evaluation of a Web-Based Silica Exposure Risk Assessment Tool in Construction: Data Appraisal and User Trial

Sharyn Gaskin, Len Turczynowicz, Chandnee Ramkissoon, Yonatal Tefera, Sarina Subedi, Halil Ahmet
article en

Abstract

Background: Respirable crystalline silica (RCS) presents persistent health risks in construction, and predictive exposure models offer a potential complement to traditional monitoring. This study evaluated the applicability of the British Columbia Construction Safety Alliance (BCCSA) Silica Control ToolTM for use in the construction sector in Victoria, Australia. Methods: A two-phase evaluation was undertaken. First, a desktop interrogation of the Tool’s underpinning data, statistical model development and documented limitations was performed, including statistical review. Second, a user trial was conducted with 12 Victorian industry stakeholders who completed realistic task scenarios within the Tool and generated Exposure Control Plans (ECPs). Qualitative feedback was obtained through observation and focus group discussion. Results: The interrogation demonstrated that the Tool is built on a large, iteratively improved North American exposure database, with well developed and statistically sound modelling framework; however, its predictive validity has not yet been independently evaluated using Australian exposure data. Stakeholders produced 14 ECPs across diverse silica-generating tasks, showing that the Tool responded sensitively to changes in task parameters and control selections. Thematic analysis identified five key themes: usability, regulatory alignment, clarity of terminology, gaps in task representation, and adherence to the hierarchy of controls. Participants saw strong potential for the Tool but emphasised the need for Australian data integration, clearer definitions, enhanced usability, and localised terminology. Conclusions: The BCCSA Silica Control ToolTM demonstrates a technically robust North American modelling framework and strong stakeholder acceptability, but Australian-specific validation and adaptation are required before adoption in Victoria. Incorporating Australian exposure data, tailoring terminology and ensuring alignment with local legislation are critical next steps.

Work and HealthVol. 2(3)
SA Health (AU), WorkSafe Victoria (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Occupational and environmental lung diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.