Evaluating soybean genotype-by-environment interactions and multi-trait stability across South African environments

Abstract Soybean is one of the significant legume crops in South Africa, yet genotype × environment interactions (GEI) complicate reliable cultivar selection. Despite this, GEI, performance, and stability of soybean genotypes have not been comprehensively evaluated across South Africa’s major soybean–producing provinces (Mpumalanga, North–West and Free State). Therefore, this study assessed GEI, performance, and stability of soybean genotypes across key agronomic traits using multi–environment trials (METs) over three growing seasons. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and genotype plus genotype–by–environment (GGE) biplot approaches were used to quantify trait variation, identify best genotypes, and characterizing environmental relationships. Stability and performance were further assessed using multi–trait stability index (MTSI), weighted average of absolute scores (WAASB), and weighted average of absolute scores and yield (WAASBY), while chord diagrams visualized inter–trait correlations. Results indicated that environmental effects dominated trait variation across all traits. Which–Won–Where patterns revealed that no genotype excelled across all environments, but G5 (LG60260IPRO) was the best genotype across all evaluated traits, particularly in cool (E1) and moderate (E2) environments across seasons. Vector analyses showed positive correlations among environments within the same location and negative correlations among contrasting environments. WAASB highlighted G8 (PAN1521R) as the most stable and high–performing genotype across all evaluated traits with dominant performance in moderate environment. WAASBY identified G5 as a superior genotype across all traits, with superiority particularly evident in cool and moderate environments. MTSI identified G2 (DM59I60 RSF IPRO) as a consistently stable genotype across all evaluated environments. Chord diagrams revealed predominantly positive inter–trait correlations across all traits in E2 and mixed correlations in E1 and E3 (warm environment). Overall, the identified superior, high–performing, and stable genotypes are promising candidates for cultivar recommendation and soybean breeding programmes targeting productivity, stability, and adaptation across South Africa’s diverse environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-68145-x
Primary Topic
Genetics and Plant Breeding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluating soybean genotype-by-environment interactions and multi-trait stability across South African environments

Annelie De Beer, Admire Shayanowako, Robert Mangani, Vuwani Makuya et al.
Scientific Reports
Genetics and Plant Breeding
article

Evaluating soybean genotype-by-environment interactions and multi-trait stability across South African environments

Annelie De Beer, Admire Shayanowako, Robert Mangani, Vuwani Makuya, Michael van der Laan, Montserrat Salmerón, Gianni Bellocchi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Soybean is one of the significant legume crops in South Africa, yet genotype × environment interactions (GEI) complicate reliable cultivar selection. Despite this, GEI, performance, and stability of soybean genotypes have not been comprehensively evaluated across South Africa’s major soybean–producing provinces (Mpumalanga, North–West and Free State). Therefore, this study assessed GEI, performance, and stability of soybean genotypes across key agronomic traits using multi–environment trials (METs) over three growing seasons. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and genotype plus genotype–by–environment (GGE) biplot approaches were used to quantify trait variation, identify best genotypes, and characterizing environmental relationships. Stability and performance were further assessed using multi–trait stability index (MTSI), weighted average of absolute scores (WAASB), and weighted average of absolute scores and yield (WAASBY), while chord diagrams visualized inter–trait correlations. Results indicated that environmental effects dominated trait variation across all traits. Which–Won–Where patterns revealed that no genotype excelled across all environments, but G5 (LG60260IPRO) was the best genotype across all evaluated traits, particularly in cool (E1) and moderate (E2) environments across seasons. Vector analyses showed positive correlations among environments within the same location and negative correlations among contrasting environments. WAASB highlighted G8 (PAN1521R) as the most stable and high–performing genotype across all evaluated traits with dominant performance in moderate environment. WAASBY identified G5 as a superior genotype across all traits, with superiority particularly evident in cool and moderate environments. MTSI identified G2 (DM59I60 RSF IPRO) as a consistently stable genotype across all evaluated environments. Chord diagrams revealed predominantly positive inter–trait correlations across all traits in E2 and mixed correlations in E1 and E3 (warm environment). Overall, the identified superior, high–performing, and stable genotypes are promising candidates for cultivar recommendation and soybean breeding programmes targeting productivity, stability, and adaptation across South Africa’s diverse environments.

Scientific Reports
University of Kentucky (US), Université Clermont Auvergne (FR), North-West University (ZA), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), VetAgro Sup (FR), Agricultural Research Council of South Africa (ZA), University of Pretoria (ZA), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Genetics and Plant Breeding
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.