Gaza Name Identity and History in Text Archaeology and Population Genetics

This study examines the history and identity of Gaza through a critical comparison of Karl Bernhard Stark's textual and linguistic reconstruction, Flinders Petrie's excavations at Tell el-Ajjul, modern archaeological discoveries, and ancient and modern genomic research. It distinguishes religious and mythological memory from contemporary textual evidence, archaeological context, and population-level genetic affinity. The study concludes that Gaza predates Philistine political control and that its name is attested centuries before Persian rule, although derivation from the Semitic root ʿ-z-z remains phonetically uncertain. Archaeology demonstrates a deep sequence of urban occupation across the Gaza region, but does not establish Tell el-Ajjul as ancient Gaza. The safest designation is a major Canaanite centre of unknown ancient name, with Sharuhen remaining a plausible but unproven identification. The early Philistines emerged through plural maritime migrations followed by rapid integration with local Canaanite populations. Genomic evidence supports regional continuity with admixture among modern Levantine populations, while the absence of a continuous ancient DNA series from Gaza prevents a Gaza-specific ancestry estimate or claims of direct descent from a particular ancient individual.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22696421
Primary Topic
Archaeology and Historical Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

Gaza Name Identity and History in Text Archaeology and Population Genetics

Mahmoud Juma
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Archaeology and Historical Studies
preprint

Gaza Name Identity and History in Text Archaeology and Population Genetics

Mahmoud Juma
preprint en

Abstract

This study examines the history and identity of Gaza through a critical comparison of Karl Bernhard Stark's textual and linguistic reconstruction, Flinders Petrie's excavations at Tell el-Ajjul, modern archaeological discoveries, and ancient and modern genomic research. It distinguishes religious and mythological memory from contemporary textual evidence, archaeological context, and population-level genetic affinity. The study concludes that Gaza predates Philistine political control and that its name is attested centuries before Persian rule, although derivation from the Semitic root ʿ-z-z remains phonetically uncertain. Archaeology demonstrates a deep sequence of urban occupation across the Gaza region, but does not establish Tell el-Ajjul as ancient Gaza. The safest designation is a major Canaanite centre of unknown ancient name, with Sharuhen remaining a plausible but unproven identification. The early Philistines emerged through plural maritime migrations followed by rapid integration with local Canaanite populations. Genomic evidence supports regional continuity with admixture among modern Levantine populations, while the absence of a continuous ancient DNA series from Gaza prevents a Gaza-specific ancestry estimate or claims of direct descent from a particular ancient individual.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sustainable cities and communities
Archaeology and Historical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.