Developing a strategy for identifying recommendations prioritized for implementation in the Colombian health system

Abstract Background Health systems guidelines (HSGs) developed by the WHO and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) developed by the Colombian Ministry of Health can potentially support national and subnational policy-development processes. Barriers to implementation encountered when making necessary changes to the Colombian health system led to our research question: What prioritized recommendations are pending implementation in Colombia, and which require changes in health system arrangements? Methods A document analysis of all 58 Colombian CPGs and all 14 WHO HSG documents was performed in April 2020. We extracted information about recommendations prioritized on the CPGs/HSGs, updated status (documents were outdated if 5 years had elapsed since publication, and close to outdated if they were in the fifth year since publication), and the strength and direction of the recommendation as graded by the guideline development group. Recommendations were evaluated by two researchers to determine whether their implementation required making changes to the health system. Those changes were classified into three dimensions: governance, financial and delivery arrangements. Results In the 71 guidelines, 958 recommendations were identified. A total of 393 (41.0%) were updated, 425 (44.4%) were outdated and 140 (14.6%) were close to outdated. Regarding the strength and direction of the recommendations, 540 were strong (56.4%), 189 were weak (19.7%) and 173 were suggested or recommended in a specific context (18.1%). Most of the recommendations were in favour of the intervention ( n = 861, 89.9%), and only 97 were against the intervention (10.1%). Among the 363 recommendations from the WHO HSGs, 244 (67.2%) had not been implemented in Colombia. Of 958 recommendations, 518 (54.1%) needed a health system arrangement for their implementation: 259 in governance, 102 in financial and 503 in delivery. Conclusions We identified 518 recommendations that require change in Colombian health system arrangements. The most common change was related to availability of care, given that many of the recommendations refer to technologies/services approved and publicly funded but not widely available or accessible to different population groups. Further research may evaluate whether this strategy helps to define priorities for implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Research Policy and Systems
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-026-01465-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Developing a strategy for identifying recommendations prioritized for implementation in the Colombian health system

Sonam Yangchen, Pamela Velásquez-Salazar, Robert Marten, Claudia Yaneth Vera-Giraldo et al.
1 citations
Health Research Policy and Systems
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
7.90
article

Developing a strategy for identifying recommendations prioritized for implementation in the Colombian health system

Sonam Yangchen, Pamela Velásquez-Salazar, Robert Marten, Claudia Yaneth Vera-Giraldo, Claudia Marcela Vélez, Juan Carlos Velásquez, Sharon Straus, Luz Helena Lugo-Agudelo, Viviana Vélez-Marín, Christine Fahim, Julián Santiago Franco
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Health systems guidelines (HSGs) developed by the WHO and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) developed by the Colombian Ministry of Health can potentially support national and subnational policy-development processes. Barriers to implementation encountered when making necessary changes to the Colombian health system led to our research question: What prioritized recommendations are pending implementation in Colombia, and which require changes in health system arrangements? Methods A document analysis of all 58 Colombian CPGs and all 14 WHO HSG documents was performed in April 2020. We extracted information about recommendations prioritized on the CPGs/HSGs, updated status (documents were outdated if 5 years had elapsed since publication, and close to outdated if they were in the fifth year since publication), and the strength and direction of the recommendation as graded by the guideline development group. Recommendations were evaluated by two researchers to determine whether their implementation required making changes to the health system. Those changes were classified into three dimensions: governance, financial and delivery arrangements. Results In the 71 guidelines, 958 recommendations were identified. A total of 393 (41.0%) were updated, 425 (44.4%) were outdated and 140 (14.6%) were close to outdated. Regarding the strength and direction of the recommendations, 540 were strong (56.4%), 189 were weak (19.7%) and 173 were suggested or recommended in a specific context (18.1%). Most of the recommendations were in favour of the intervention ( n = 861, 89.9%), and only 97 were against the intervention (10.1%). Among the 363 recommendations from the WHO HSGs, 244 (67.2%) had not been implemented in Colombia. Of 958 recommendations, 518 (54.1%) needed a health system arrangement for their implementation: 259 in governance, 102 in financial and 503 in delivery. Conclusions We identified 518 recommendations that require change in Colombian health system arrangements. The most common change was related to availability of care, given that many of the recommendations refer to technologies/services approved and publicly funded but not widely available or accessible to different population groups. Further research may evaluate whether this strategy helps to define priorities for implementation.

Health Research Policy and SystemsVol. 24(S1)
St. Michael's Hospital (CA), Universidad de Antioquia (CO), Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research (CH), St Michael's Hospital (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
7.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.