Regionalized life cycle assessment of NMC and LFP batteries across China-EU supply chain configurations under the EU Battery Regulation

The EU Battery Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 introduces stringent life cycle carbon footprint requirements that are expected to influence the regional organization of battery production. However, the carbon footprint implications of alternative China-EU supply chain configurations remain insufficiently understood. This study develops a regionalized life cycle assessment framework to evaluate the life cycle carbon footprints of lithium nickel‑manganese‑cobalt (NMC) and lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries under alternative regional supply chain configurations between China and the EU. The analysis follows the latest EU methodological guidance and combines proprietary industrial data from leading Chinese electric vehicle (EV) battery manufacturers. The boundary analysis showed that the calculated carbon footprints were sensitive to the life cycle stages included. Under the EU baseline, the carbon footprints of NMC and LFP batteries were 96.2 and 51.6 gCO 2 e/kWh under the Directive 91/157/EEC-informed reference boundary, 95.9 and 81.3 gCO 2 e/kWh under the Directive 2006/66/EC-informed reference boundary, and 142.9 and 128.3 gCO 2 e/kWh under the Regulation (EU) 2023/1542-aligned full life cycle boundary, respectively. Scenario analysis further indicated that regional supply chain reconfiguration can substantially narrow carbon footprint differences relative to Baseline-EU. For NMC batteries, the difference decreased from 59.3 gCO 2 e/kWh under the export (EX) scenario to 49.3 and 47.7 gCO 2 e/kWh under the overseas battery production (TB) scenario and partial material pre-processing in the EU (TBM) scenario, respectively. For LFP batteries, the corresponding values decreased from 74.1 to 49.4 and 47.1 gCO 2 e/kWh. These findings suggest that the regulatory context may encourage supply chain configurations with lower life cycle carbon footprints by altering the regional allocation of production stages. The findings highlight the importance of aligning regional production characteristics with decarbonization potential and provide policy-relevant evidence for coordinated China-EU battery supply chain strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108718
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Regionalized life cycle assessment of NMC and LFP batteries across China-EU supply chain configurations under the EU Battery Regulation

Mandy Meng Fang, Dongchang Zhao, Zhenlu LEI, Wenjing Gong et al.
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Extraction and Separation Processes
article

Regionalized life cycle assessment of NMC and LFP batteries across China-EU supply chain configurations under the EU Battery Regulation

Mandy Meng Fang, Dongchang Zhao, Zhenlu LEI, Wenjing Gong, Liang Dong, Xin Sun, Chenyang Wang, Yuting Xie, Lu Sun, Fengqi You, Hongjie Zhang, Pan Wang
article en

Abstract

The EU Battery Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 introduces stringent life cycle carbon footprint requirements that are expected to influence the regional organization of battery production. However, the carbon footprint implications of alternative China-EU supply chain configurations remain insufficiently understood. This study develops a regionalized life cycle assessment framework to evaluate the life cycle carbon footprints of lithium nickel‑manganese‑cobalt (NMC) and lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries under alternative regional supply chain configurations between China and the EU. The analysis follows the latest EU methodological guidance and combines proprietary industrial data from leading Chinese electric vehicle (EV) battery manufacturers. The boundary analysis showed that the calculated carbon footprints were sensitive to the life cycle stages included. Under the EU baseline, the carbon footprints of NMC and LFP batteries were 96.2 and 51.6 gCO 2 e/kWh under the Directive 91/157/EEC-informed reference boundary, 95.9 and 81.3 gCO 2 e/kWh under the Directive 2006/66/EC-informed reference boundary, and 142.9 and 128.3 gCO 2 e/kWh under the Regulation (EU) 2023/1542-aligned full life cycle boundary, respectively. Scenario analysis further indicated that regional supply chain reconfiguration can substantially narrow carbon footprint differences relative to Baseline-EU. For NMC batteries, the difference decreased from 59.3 gCO 2 e/kWh under the export (EX) scenario to 49.3 and 47.7 gCO 2 e/kWh under the overseas battery production (TB) scenario and partial material pre-processing in the EU (TBM) scenario, respectively. For LFP batteries, the corresponding values decreased from 74.1 to 49.4 and 47.1 gCO 2 e/kWh. These findings suggest that the regulatory context may encourage supply chain configurations with lower life cycle carbon footprints by altering the regional allocation of production stages. The findings highlight the importance of aligning regional production characteristics with decarbonization potential and provide policy-relevant evidence for coordinated China-EU battery supply chain strategies.

Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewVol. 123
City University of Hong Kong (HK), Cornell University (US), China Automotive Technology and Research Center (CN), Shandong University of Science and Technology (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Extraction and Separation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.