Evaluation of deep-learning iterative reconstruction combined with high-frequency kernels in CT: a task-based image quality study

Abstract Objective To evaluate the image quality of a novel deep-learning iterative reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm combined with high-frequency kernels compared with iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms through the assessment of the detectability of small high-contrast lesions. Materials and methods Three image-quality phantoms were scanned with doses from 0.8 to 15 mGy. Images were reconstructed using ASIR-V0, ASIR-V80, and DLIR (Low, Medium, High), with an edge-enhancing kernel for a chest protocol and a sharp kernel for a spine protocol. A dedicated cubic phantom was used to assess axial, longitudinal resolution, and noise power spectra. Contrast of calcium-based lesions of 3 and 5 mm in diameter was assessed at three concentrations (200, 400, and 800 mg/cc) using two anthropomorphic chest and abdominal phantoms. Detectability was evaluated using a non-prewhitening with eye filter model observer. Results In-plane spatial resolution was stable across DLIR strength levels and slightly better than ASIR-V0, while longitudinal resolution did not depend on algorithms. DLIR markedly reduced image noise, below ASIR-V80 for DLIR-High with both kernels. While IR preserved the contrast of lesions, it decreased with DLIR strength for the small lesion 200 mg/cc-3mm. The highest detectability was achieved with DLIR-High, except for the HA200-3mm below 3 mGy for the chest protocol and 7 mGy for the spine protocol. Conclusion DLIR combined with high-frequency kernels reduced image noise while preserving spatial resolution and FBP-like noise texture, outperforming IR in detectability for most lesion sizes, concentrations, and dose levels. DLIR reduced contrast for small and low-concentration lesions, especially at low doses, which partially counterbalanced its detectability advantage over IR. Key Points Question This study evaluates whether deep-learning reconstruction with high-frequency kernels improves the detectability of small high-contrast lesions compared to iterative reconstruction. Findings The new deep-learning reconstruction reduces image noise while preserving fine anatomical detail and improving in-plane spatial resolution. Relevance statement The new deep-learning reconstruction combined with high-frequency kernels improves detection of small lesions in comparison with iterative reconstruction at standard doses, but very small or low-density lesions may appear less visible at lower dose levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Radiology Experimental
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-026-00801-3
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluation of deep-learning iterative reconstruction combined with high-frequency kernels in CT: a task-based image quality study

Pascal Monnin, Chiara Pozzessere, Damien Racine, Anaïs Viry
European Radiology Experimental
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Evaluation of deep-learning iterative reconstruction combined with high-frequency kernels in CT: a task-based image quality study

Pascal Monnin, Chiara Pozzessere, Damien Racine, Anaïs Viry
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate the image quality of a novel deep-learning iterative reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm combined with high-frequency kernels compared with iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms through the assessment of the detectability of small high-contrast lesions. Materials and methods Three image-quality phantoms were scanned with doses from 0.8 to 15 mGy. Images were reconstructed using ASIR-V0, ASIR-V80, and DLIR (Low, Medium, High), with an edge-enhancing kernel for a chest protocol and a sharp kernel for a spine protocol. A dedicated cubic phantom was used to assess axial, longitudinal resolution, and noise power spectra. Contrast of calcium-based lesions of 3 and 5 mm in diameter was assessed at three concentrations (200, 400, and 800 mg/cc) using two anthropomorphic chest and abdominal phantoms. Detectability was evaluated using a non-prewhitening with eye filter model observer. Results In-plane spatial resolution was stable across DLIR strength levels and slightly better than ASIR-V0, while longitudinal resolution did not depend on algorithms. DLIR markedly reduced image noise, below ASIR-V80 for DLIR-High with both kernels. While IR preserved the contrast of lesions, it decreased with DLIR strength for the small lesion 200 mg/cc-3mm. The highest detectability was achieved with DLIR-High, except for the HA200-3mm below 3 mGy for the chest protocol and 7 mGy for the spine protocol. Conclusion DLIR combined with high-frequency kernels reduced image noise while preserving spatial resolution and FBP-like noise texture, outperforming IR in detectability for most lesion sizes, concentrations, and dose levels. DLIR reduced contrast for small and low-concentration lesions, especially at low doses, which partially counterbalanced its detectability advantage over IR. Key Points Question This study evaluates whether deep-learning reconstruction with high-frequency kernels improves the detectability of small high-contrast lesions compared to iterative reconstruction. Findings The new deep-learning reconstruction reduces image noise while preserving fine anatomical detail and improving in-plane spatial resolution. Relevance statement The new deep-learning reconstruction combined with high-frequency kernels improves detection of small lesions in comparison with iterative reconstruction at standard doses, but very small or low-density lesions may appear less visible at lower dose levels.

European Radiology ExperimentalVol. 10(1)
University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.