Carceral maneuvers, carceral distractions: Analyzing the retraction and expansion of Canada's power to detain non-citizens

This article traces the Canada Border Services Agency's (CBSA) turn to federal prisons in response to all 10 Canadian provinces ending their immigration detention arrangements with the CBSA by 2025. We analyze the CBSA's insistence that additional carceral spaces are needed to manage a small but persistent population of “high risk detainees” deemed unsuitable for confinement in one of its immigration holding centers. We situate this current turn to federal prisons within the broader context of Canadian immigration detention reform and the productive power of racialized risk thinking to justify carceral solutions to unwanted non-citizens, arguing that moments of reform “victory,” while important and often necessary, may offer distraction from the carceral state's power to ensure its capacity to detain. Drawing on Gurusami et al.'s conceptualization of “carceral distractions,” we bring an abolition feminist analysis to these reform efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social & Legal Studies
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639261486355
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carceral maneuvers, carceral distractions: Analyzing the retraction and expansion of Canada's power to detain non-citizens

Sarah Turnbull, Kate Motluk
Social & Legal Studies
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

Carceral maneuvers, carceral distractions: Analyzing the retraction and expansion of Canada's power to detain non-citizens

Sarah Turnbull, Kate Motluk
article en

Abstract

This article traces the Canada Border Services Agency's (CBSA) turn to federal prisons in response to all 10 Canadian provinces ending their immigration detention arrangements with the CBSA by 2025. We analyze the CBSA's insistence that additional carceral spaces are needed to manage a small but persistent population of “high risk detainees” deemed unsuitable for confinement in one of its immigration holding centers. We situate this current turn to federal prisons within the broader context of Canadian immigration detention reform and the productive power of racialized risk thinking to justify carceral solutions to unwanted non-citizens, arguing that moments of reform “victory,” while important and often necessary, may offer distraction from the carceral state's power to ensure its capacity to detain. Drawing on Gurusami et al.'s conceptualization of “carceral distractions,” we bring an abolition feminist analysis to these reform efforts.

Social & Legal Studies
University of Waterloo (CA), University of Toronto (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.