A Multistep Registration Framework for Multimodal Histology Across Same and Consecutive Sections

Abstract Multimodal digital pathology combines hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining with advanced microscopy techniques to provide complementary structural and molecular information. However, accurate registration between H&E and other modalities remains challenging, especially when images differ strongly in appearance or are acquired on nonidentical consecutive sections. We present a multistep multimodal registration workflow that combines a multiscale histogram of local main orientations (MS-HLMO), a multimodal feature-based rigid initialization, with B-spline nonrigid registration and thin-plate spline refinement. We evaluated this approach on two datasets: human intestinal inflammatory bowel disease sections imaged with nonlinear multimodal microscopy (nMM) and H&E and head and neck cancer biopsies imaged with H&E and coherent Raman scattering (CRS), including single-band stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) and multimodal CRS images on parallel frozen sections. Registration performance was quantified using landmark and boundary-based metrics. The workflow was compared with several registration approaches, including scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT), B-spline deformable registration, MS-HLMO, and VALIS. For H&E/SRS pairs, the workflow reduced the median landmark error from 0.01459 to 0.01204 and lowered the mask boundary error from 0.0482 to 0.0115 compared with MS-HLMO. For H&E/nMM pairs, it achieved the lowest boundary errors, while B-spline registration yielded the smallest landmark errors, indicating a trade-off between point accuracy and boundary alignment. Qualitative checkerboards showed that the proposed method produced more consistent multimodal alignments than SIFT and VALIS across the evaluated datasets. These results demonstrate that the proposed workflow provides robust multimodal registration for both same-section and consecutive-section histology and enables reliable transfer of annotations between H&E and advanced microscopy modalities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-026-02278-3
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multistep Registration Framework for Multimodal Histology Across Same and Consecutive Sections

Thomas Wilhelm Bocklitz, Rodrigo Escobar Díaz Guerrero, Fatemehzahra Darzi
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
AI in cancer detection
article

A Multistep Registration Framework for Multimodal Histology Across Same and Consecutive Sections

Thomas Wilhelm Bocklitz, Rodrigo Escobar Díaz Guerrero, Fatemehzahra Darzi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Multimodal digital pathology combines hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining with advanced microscopy techniques to provide complementary structural and molecular information. However, accurate registration between H&E and other modalities remains challenging, especially when images differ strongly in appearance or are acquired on nonidentical consecutive sections. We present a multistep multimodal registration workflow that combines a multiscale histogram of local main orientations (MS-HLMO), a multimodal feature-based rigid initialization, with B-spline nonrigid registration and thin-plate spline refinement. We evaluated this approach on two datasets: human intestinal inflammatory bowel disease sections imaged with nonlinear multimodal microscopy (nMM) and H&E and head and neck cancer biopsies imaged with H&E and coherent Raman scattering (CRS), including single-band stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) and multimodal CRS images on parallel frozen sections. Registration performance was quantified using landmark and boundary-based metrics. The workflow was compared with several registration approaches, including scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT), B-spline deformable registration, MS-HLMO, and VALIS. For H&E/SRS pairs, the workflow reduced the median landmark error from 0.01459 to 0.01204 and lowered the mask boundary error from 0.0482 to 0.0115 compared with MS-HLMO. For H&E/nMM pairs, it achieved the lowest boundary errors, while B-spline registration yielded the smallest landmark errors, indicating a trade-off between point accuracy and boundary alignment. Qualitative checkerboards showed that the proposed method produced more consistent multimodal alignments than SIFT and VALIS across the evaluated datasets. These results demonstrate that the proposed workflow provides robust multimodal registration for both same-section and consecutive-section histology and enables reliable transfer of annotations between H&E and advanced microscopy modalities.

Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.