Patterns of Health Care Spending in Prostate Cancer

Importance Prostate cancer care has evolved substantially during the past decade, with increasing use of systemic therapies across the disease spectrum. How these changes have affected the composition of spending for prostate cancer–related health care remains incompletely characterized. Objective To evaluate temporal trends in prostate cancer–related health care expenditures and identify the major components of care accounting for changes in spending from 2012 to 2021. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-level economic evaluation used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–Medicare linked data from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021. The analysis was performed in January 2026. Participants included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma and prostate cancer–related claims during the study period. Exposures Calendar year and category of services for prostate cancer–related health care. Main Outcomes and Measures Annual aggregate prostate cancer–related Medicare expenditures were inflation-adjusted to 2017 US dollars and categorized by radiotherapy, surgery, cryotherapy and/or high-intensity focused ultrasonography, systemic therapy, and diagnostic and monitoring services. Systemic therapy expenditures were further categorized as first-generation androgen deprivation therapy, second-generation androgen receptor–targeted therapy, and other systemic therapies. Results In the descriptive fee-for-service cohort at diagnosis, 1 231 567 beneficiaries were included; the mean (SD) age was 73.2 (7.7) years. Aggregate prostate cancer–related expenditures increased from $504 million in 2012 to $1.9 billion in 2021. Radiotherapy accounted for $227 million (45.0%) in 2012 and $228 million (12.0%) in 2021, reflecting relatively stable absolute expenditures but a declining share of total spending. Surgery accounted for $53 million (10.5%) in 2012 and $67 million (3.5%) in 2021. In contrast, systemic therapy spending increased from $142 million (28.1%) in 2012 to $1.4 billion (74.0%) in 2021. By 2021, second-generation androgen receptor–targeted therapy accounted for $1.2 billion (86.6% of systemic therapy spending and 64.0% of total prostate cancer–related expenditures). Conclusions and Relevance In this economic evaluation of SEER-Medicare data, spending for prostate cancer–related health care increased substantially from 2012 to 2021, with a marked shift toward systemic therapy. These findings suggest that prolonged systemic treatment has become a dominant component of prostate cancer spending and should be central to future discussions of health care sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.33031
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns of Health Care Spending in Prostate Cancer

Mutlay Sayan, Aaron Katz, Ronald Chen, Yahui Xie et al.
JAMA Network Open
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Patterns of Health Care Spending in Prostate Cancer

Mutlay Sayan, Aaron Katz, Ronald Chen, Yahui Xie, Jiaye Shen
article en

Abstract

Importance Prostate cancer care has evolved substantially during the past decade, with increasing use of systemic therapies across the disease spectrum. How these changes have affected the composition of spending for prostate cancer–related health care remains incompletely characterized. Objective To evaluate temporal trends in prostate cancer–related health care expenditures and identify the major components of care accounting for changes in spending from 2012 to 2021. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-level economic evaluation used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–Medicare linked data from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021. The analysis was performed in January 2026. Participants included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma and prostate cancer–related claims during the study period. Exposures Calendar year and category of services for prostate cancer–related health care. Main Outcomes and Measures Annual aggregate prostate cancer–related Medicare expenditures were inflation-adjusted to 2017 US dollars and categorized by radiotherapy, surgery, cryotherapy and/or high-intensity focused ultrasonography, systemic therapy, and diagnostic and monitoring services. Systemic therapy expenditures were further categorized as first-generation androgen deprivation therapy, second-generation androgen receptor–targeted therapy, and other systemic therapies. Results In the descriptive fee-for-service cohort at diagnosis, 1 231 567 beneficiaries were included; the mean (SD) age was 73.2 (7.7) years. Aggregate prostate cancer–related expenditures increased from $504 million in 2012 to $1.9 billion in 2021. Radiotherapy accounted for $227 million (45.0%) in 2012 and $228 million (12.0%) in 2021, reflecting relatively stable absolute expenditures but a declining share of total spending. Surgery accounted for $53 million (10.5%) in 2012 and $67 million (3.5%) in 2021. In contrast, systemic therapy spending increased from $142 million (28.1%) in 2012 to $1.4 billion (74.0%) in 2021. By 2021, second-generation androgen receptor–targeted therapy accounted for $1.2 billion (86.6% of systemic therapy spending and 64.0% of total prostate cancer–related expenditures). Conclusions and Relevance In this economic evaluation of SEER-Medicare data, spending for prostate cancer–related health care increased substantially from 2012 to 2021, with a marked shift toward systemic therapy. These findings suggest that prolonged systemic treatment has become a dominant component of prostate cancer spending and should be central to future discussions of health care sustainability.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(9)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.