Tradition-innovation ambidexterity in family firms: a literature review and emerging framework

Purpose Organizational ambidexterity refers to a firm's ability to balance exploitation and exploration, thereby reconciling efficiency and innovation. This tension is particularly salient in family firms, where exploitation is often associated with tradition, legacy, and identity, while exploration is commonly linked to innovation and strategic renewal. This study integrates fragmented literature on ambidexterity in family firms into a framework of key antecedents and outcomes. Design/methodology/approach This study conducts a systematic literature review of 65 articles indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. Through a structured coding and synthesis process, it develops an integrative framework capturing the main antecedents and outcomes of ambidexterity in family firms. Findings The study identifies three clusters of antecedents: Ownership Factors, Organizational and Management Factors, and Environmental and Cultural Factors, and three main outcomes: longevity and continuity, firm performance, and organizational sustainability. These antecedents shape the conditions under which family firms develop organizational ambidexterity, which in turn influences multiple outcomes. Research limitations/implications As a literature-based study, this article offers a conceptual synthesis that future empirical research could test and refine across different family firm contexts. Practical implications The framework supports practitioners in developing a holistic understanding of the drivers of ambidexterity, helping family firms identify and coordinate key factors that enable the balance between tradition and innovation. Originality/value This study develops an integrative framework that synthesizes both the antecedents and organizational outcomes of ambidexterity in family firms. Whereas previous literature reviews have examined antecedents and outcomes in isolation or addressed specific aspects of ambidexterity separately, this review integrates multiple dimensions into a coherent framework interpreted through the tradition-innovation lens. The framework reveals how ownership, organizational and managerial, and environmental and cultural conditions collectively define the set of factors associated with ambidexterity, which in turn influences longevity and continuity, firm performance, and organizational sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Business Management
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfbm-04-2026-0129
Primary Topic
Family Business Performance and Succession
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Tradition-innovation ambidexterity in family firms: a literature review and emerging framework

Francesca Ricciardi, Alisea Catalani
Journal of Family Business Management
Family Business Performance and Succession
article

Tradition-innovation ambidexterity in family firms: a literature review and emerging framework

Francesca Ricciardi, Alisea Catalani
article en

Abstract

Purpose Organizational ambidexterity refers to a firm's ability to balance exploitation and exploration, thereby reconciling efficiency and innovation. This tension is particularly salient in family firms, where exploitation is often associated with tradition, legacy, and identity, while exploration is commonly linked to innovation and strategic renewal. This study integrates fragmented literature on ambidexterity in family firms into a framework of key antecedents and outcomes. Design/methodology/approach This study conducts a systematic literature review of 65 articles indexed in Scopus and Web of Science. Through a structured coding and synthesis process, it develops an integrative framework capturing the main antecedents and outcomes of ambidexterity in family firms. Findings The study identifies three clusters of antecedents: Ownership Factors, Organizational and Management Factors, and Environmental and Cultural Factors, and three main outcomes: longevity and continuity, firm performance, and organizational sustainability. These antecedents shape the conditions under which family firms develop organizational ambidexterity, which in turn influences multiple outcomes. Research limitations/implications As a literature-based study, this article offers a conceptual synthesis that future empirical research could test and refine across different family firm contexts. Practical implications The framework supports practitioners in developing a holistic understanding of the drivers of ambidexterity, helping family firms identify and coordinate key factors that enable the balance between tradition and innovation. Originality/value This study develops an integrative framework that synthesizes both the antecedents and organizational outcomes of ambidexterity in family firms. Whereas previous literature reviews have examined antecedents and outcomes in isolation or addressed specific aspects of ambidexterity separately, this review integrates multiple dimensions into a coherent framework interpreted through the tradition-innovation lens. The framework reveals how ownership, organizational and managerial, and environmental and cultural conditions collectively define the set of factors associated with ambidexterity, which in turn influences longevity and continuity, firm performance, and organizational sustainability.

Journal of Family Business Management
University of Turin (IT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Family Business Performance and Succession
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.