Performance of an artificial intelligence program for assessing the depth of early gastric cancer using endoscopic images

Background and study aims: The depth of early gastric cancer is an important factor in determining treatment plans, such as endoscopic resection or surgery. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) program using deep neural networks to diagnose mucosal and submucosal cancers via endoscopic images. Performance evaluation tests were conducted for its clinical applications. Patients and methods: A test dataset comprising 204 early gastric cancer cases treated with endoscopic resection or surgery at our hospital between 2018 and 2021 was established. A minimum of five white-light imaging (WLI) images per case were used (median, 8; range, 5–22). The primary endpoint was the sensitivity for diagnosing mucosal cancer. The AI program was defined as useful when the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) exceeded 75%, based on previous reports on the depth diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Secondary endpoints were specificity and accuracy. Results: In our study, the sensitivity of this program for the diagnosis of mucosal cancer was 91.2%, and the lower limit of the 95% CI of sensitivity was 85.2%, which was higher than 75%, indicating the usefulness of this program. The specificity and accuracy were 66.2% and 82.8%, respectively. Conclusions: The AI program developed to diagnose the depth of early gastric cancer is useful and expected to be clinically useful.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy International Open
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2957-0692
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Performance of an artificial intelligence program for assessing the depth of early gastric cancer using endoscopic images

Takuya Satomi, Yoshiro Kawahara, Masaya Iwamuro, Yoshiyasu Kono et al.
Endoscopy International Open
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Performance of an artificial intelligence program for assessing the depth of early gastric cancer using endoscopic images

Takuya Satomi, Yoshiro Kawahara, Masaya Iwamuro, Yoshiyasu Kono, Shoichiro Hirata, Tomoki Yoshikawa, Yusuke Aya, Takehiro Tanaka, Chihiro Sakaguchi, Motoyuki Otsuka, Katsunori Matsueda, Daisuke Uchida, Ayano Nishio, Yoshie Maki, Shinji Kuroda, Kenta Hamada
article en

Abstract

Background and study aims: The depth of early gastric cancer is an important factor in determining treatment plans, such as endoscopic resection or surgery. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) program using deep neural networks to diagnose mucosal and submucosal cancers via endoscopic images. Performance evaluation tests were conducted for its clinical applications. Patients and methods: A test dataset comprising 204 early gastric cancer cases treated with endoscopic resection or surgery at our hospital between 2018 and 2021 was established. A minimum of five white-light imaging (WLI) images per case were used (median, 8; range, 5–22). The primary endpoint was the sensitivity for diagnosing mucosal cancer. The AI program was defined as useful when the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) exceeded 75%, based on previous reports on the depth diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Secondary endpoints were specificity and accuracy. Results: In our study, the sensitivity of this program for the diagnosis of mucosal cancer was 91.2%, and the lower limit of the 95% CI of sensitivity was 85.2%, which was higher than 75%, indicating the usefulness of this program. The specificity and accuracy were 66.2% and 82.8%, respectively. Conclusions: The AI program developed to diagnose the depth of early gastric cancer is useful and expected to be clinically useful.

Endoscopy International Open
Okayama University (JP), Okayama University Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.