Bioengineered Vascular Grafts for Hemodialysis Access: Design Requirements, Clinical Evidence, and Translational Barriers

{"Autogenous":[0],"arteriovenous":[1],"fistulas":[2],"(AVFs)":[3],"remain":[4,61],"the":[5,34,158,166],"preferred":[6],"hemodialysis":[7,83],"access":[8],"when":[9],"suitable":[10],"vessels":[11],"and":[12,24,60,68,91,109,123,144,165,170,180,212],"sufficient":[13],"maturation":[14],"time":[15],"are":[16,56,184],"available,":[17],"but":[18,131],"high":[19],"nonmaturation":[20],"rates,":[21],"catheter":[22],"dependence,":[23],"increasing":[25],"multimorbidity":[26],"in":[27],"end-stage":[28],"kidney":[29],"disease":[30],"(ESKD)":[31],"have":[32],"intensified":[33],"need":[35],"for":[36,82],"reliable":[37],"alternative":[38],"conduits.":[39],"Conventional":[40],"expanded":[41],"polytetrafluoroethylene":[42],"(ePTFE)":[43],"grafts":[44,78,127],"provide":[45],"an":[46],"immediately":[47],"available":[48],"surgical":[49],"option,":[50],"yet":[51],"their":[52],"chemically":[53],"inert":[54],"surfaces":[55],"not":[57],"intrinsically":[58],"blood-compatible":[59],"susceptible":[62],"to":[63,98],"thrombosis,":[64],"infection,":[65],"compliance":[66],"mismatch,":[67],"venous":[69],"neointimal":[70],"hyperplasia.":[71],"This":[72],"critical":[73],"review":[74],"evaluates":[75],"bioengineered":[76],"vascular":[77],"as":[79,186],"candidate":[80],"solutions":[81],"access,":[84],"emphasizing":[85],"how":[86],"material":[87],"design,":[88],"tissue-engineered":[89,126],"scaffolds,":[90,177],"localized":[92],"therapeutic":[93],"delivery":[94],"must":[95],"be":[96],"matched":[97],"dialysis-specific":[99],"requirements,":[100],"including":[101,157],"puncture":[102],"sealing,":[103],"suture":[104],"retention,":[105],"infection":[106],"resistance,":[107],"endothelialization,":[108],"high-flow":[110],"durability.":[111],"Early":[112],"clinical":[113,193],"experience":[114],"with":[115,205],"endogenous":[116],"tissue":[117],"restoration":[118],"grafts,":[119],"human":[120],"acellular":[121],"vessels,":[122],"scaffold-free":[124],"autologous":[125],"provides":[128],"encouraging":[129],"signals,":[130],"current":[132],"evidence":[133],"remains":[134],"limited":[135],"by":[136],"small":[137],"cohorts,":[138],"single-arm":[139],"designs,":[140],"incomplete":[141],"comparative":[142],"data,":[143],"uncertain":[145],"long-term":[146],"performance":[147],"under":[148],"repeated":[149],"cannulation.":[150],"We":[151],"also":[152],"examine":[153],"major":[154],"translational":[155],"barriers,":[156],"\\"uremic":[159],"mismatch\\"":[160],"between":[161],"healthy":[162],"animal":[163],"models":[164],"inflammatory,":[167],"calcified,":[168],"hypercoagulable,":[169],"immunologically":[171],"impaired":[172],"ESKD":[173,197],"milieu.":[174],"Finally,":[175],"immunomodulatory":[176],"4D-printed":[178],"structures,":[179],"biosensing":[181],"graft":[182,203],"concepts":[183],"discussed":[185],"experimental":[187],"research":[188],"directions":[189],"rather":[190],"than":[191],"established":[192],"solutions.":[194],"A":[195],"patient-centered,":[196],"Life-Plan-informed":[198],"strategy":[199],"may":[200],"ultimately":[201],"align":[202],"selection":[204],"vessel":[206],"quality,":[207],"life":[208],"expectancy,":[209],"dialysis":[210],"trajectory,":[211],"acceptable":[213],"intervention":[214],"burden.":[215]}

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6c00469
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Bioengineered Vascular Grafts for Hemodialysis Access: Design Requirements, Clinical Evidence, and Translational Barriers

Suqi Rui, Junjie Chen, Lei Tian
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Bioengineered Vascular Grafts for Hemodialysis Access: Design Requirements, Clinical Evidence, and Translational Barriers

Suqi Rui, Junjie Chen, Lei Tian
article en

Abstract

Autogenous arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) remain the preferred hemodialysis access when suitable vessels and sufficient maturation time are available, but high nonmaturation rates, catheter dependence, and increasing multimorbidity in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) have intensified the need for reliable alternative conduits. Conventional expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) grafts provide an immediately available surgical option, yet their chemically inert surfaces are not intrinsically blood-compatible and remain susceptible to thrombosis, infection, compliance mismatch, and venous neointimal hyperplasia. This critical review evaluates bioengineered vascular grafts as candidate solutions for hemodialysis access, emphasizing how material design, tissue-engineered scaffolds, and localized therapeutic delivery must be matched to dialysis-specific requirements, including puncture sealing, suture retention, infection resistance, endothelialization, and high-flow durability. Early clinical experience with endogenous tissue restoration grafts, human acellular vessels, and scaffold-free autologous tissue-engineered grafts provides encouraging signals, but current evidence remains limited by small cohorts, single-arm designs, incomplete comparative data, and uncertain long-term performance under repeated cannulation. We also examine major translational barriers, including the "uremic mismatch" between healthy animal models and the inflammatory, calcified, hypercoagulable, and immunologically impaired ESKD milieu. Finally, immunomodulatory scaffolds, 4D-printed structures, and biosensing graft concepts are discussed as experimental research directions rather than established clinical solutions. A patient-centered, ESKD Life-Plan-informed strategy may ultimately align graft selection with vessel quality, life expectancy, dialysis trajectory, and acceptable intervention burden.

ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
Nanjing Children's Hospital (CN), Gaochun People's Hospital (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (CN), Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.