Privileging an empire state of mind: imperialism in open educational resources

Purpose This study examines how widely used online open educational resources (OERs) present narratives of imperialism from 1789 to 1914, with particular attention to the prevalence of “balance sheet” approaches and the authorial perspectives of primary and secondary sources. Design/methodology/approach The authors used a content analysis approach to examine 46 sets of OERs drawn from four major platforms. Findings OERs overwhelmingly privilege pro-imperial perspectives, with 85.7% of primary sources recorded by colonizers with few sources recorded by colonized peoples. OERs frequently privilege Eurocentric narratives and minimize colonial voices, thus normalizing imperial conquest and perpetuating systemic silences. Originality/value This study extends existing research to analyze commonly used OERs, revealing how these online materials reproduce ahistoric and problematic narratives of imperialism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Studies Research and Practice
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ssrp-03-2026-0037
Primary Topic
Open Education and E-Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Privileging an empire state of mind: imperialism in open educational resources

Stephen Jackson, Anna M. Yonas
Social Studies Research and Practice
Open Education and E-Learning
article

Privileging an empire state of mind: imperialism in open educational resources

Stephen Jackson, Anna M. Yonas
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines how widely used online open educational resources (OERs) present narratives of imperialism from 1789 to 1914, with particular attention to the prevalence of “balance sheet” approaches and the authorial perspectives of primary and secondary sources. Design/methodology/approach The authors used a content analysis approach to examine 46 sets of OERs drawn from four major platforms. Findings OERs overwhelmingly privilege pro-imperial perspectives, with 85.7% of primary sources recorded by colonizers with few sources recorded by colonized peoples. OERs frequently privilege Eurocentric narratives and minimize colonial voices, thus normalizing imperial conquest and perpetuating systemic silences. Originality/value This study extends existing research to analyze commonly used OERs, revealing how these online materials reproduce ahistoric and problematic narratives of imperialism.

Social Studies Research and Practice
University of Kansas (US), Institute of Educational Policy (GR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Open Education and E-Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.