Perspectives of intensive care professionals on extubation practices, causes of delays, and proposed solutions: A cross-sectional study

Background Timely extubation is essential to ensure patient safety and efficient intensive care unit (ICU) management. Delays in extubation can lead to adverse outcomes and extended hospital stays. Although several factors affect timely extubation, those contributing to delays, especially in Saudi Arabian ICUs, have not been well described. This study aimed to identify factors contributing to delayed extubation in Saudi Arabian ICUs from the perspective of ICU healthcare professionals (HCPs), including physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists (RTs). Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Saudi Arabia among physicians, respiratory therapists (RTs), and nurses with at least three months of ICU experience. The questionnaire assessed perceived extubation timing, comfort with extubation order placement, perceived barriers to delayed extubation, and suggested solutions. Likert-scale items were interpreted as perceived barrier scores, with higher scores indicating stronger perceived barriers to delay. Open-ended responses were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis framework. Results In total, 292 ICU professionals participated in the study (22% physicians, 31% nurses, and 45% RTs). Although most respondents (78%) reported that extubation usually occurred within 3 hours of a successful spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), their perceptions of the appropriateness of this timing differed. The most frequently reported barriers to timely extubation were staffing limitations (18%), communication and teamwork issues (16%), and procedural inefficiencies (14%). Physician comfort levels with placing extubation orders varied significantly by seniority ( p < .001). Suggested solutions included standardized protocols (20%), adequate staffing (18%), and routine assessments (16%). Conclusions ICU healthcare professionals perceived delayed extubation as mainly associated with modifiable organizational and workflow-related barriers. Addressing these barriers through interprofessional collaboration, protocol standardization, and targeted training may optimize the extubation process and ultimately may inform future quality improvement initiatives in Saudi ICUs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29390/001c.169500
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Perspectives of intensive care professionals on extubation practices, causes of delays, and proposed solutions: A cross-sectional study

Abdullah S Alsulayyim, Ali Alasmari, Sarah Alsaedi, Abdulrahman M. Hawsawi et al.
Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Perspectives of intensive care professionals on extubation practices, causes of delays, and proposed solutions: A cross-sectional study

Abdullah S Alsulayyim, Ali Alasmari, Sarah Alsaedi, Abdulrahman M. Hawsawi, Fahad H. Alahmadi, Yahya A. Alzahrani, Haneen Alrehaili, Joud Mahrous, Deemah Alahmadi, Eman Sobh, Ziyad Alshehri, Keir EJ Philip, Ghadha Alosaimi, Faten S Almutairi, Ahmad I. Alhusseini, Fatemah N Alahmadi
article en

Abstract

Background Timely extubation is essential to ensure patient safety and efficient intensive care unit (ICU) management. Delays in extubation can lead to adverse outcomes and extended hospital stays. Although several factors affect timely extubation, those contributing to delays, especially in Saudi Arabian ICUs, have not been well described. This study aimed to identify factors contributing to delayed extubation in Saudi Arabian ICUs from the perspective of ICU healthcare professionals (HCPs), including physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists (RTs). Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Saudi Arabia among physicians, respiratory therapists (RTs), and nurses with at least three months of ICU experience. The questionnaire assessed perceived extubation timing, comfort with extubation order placement, perceived barriers to delayed extubation, and suggested solutions. Likert-scale items were interpreted as perceived barrier scores, with higher scores indicating stronger perceived barriers to delay. Open-ended responses were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis framework. Results In total, 292 ICU professionals participated in the study (22% physicians, 31% nurses, and 45% RTs). Although most respondents (78%) reported that extubation usually occurred within 3 hours of a successful spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), their perceptions of the appropriateness of this timing differed. The most frequently reported barriers to timely extubation were staffing limitations (18%), communication and teamwork issues (16%), and procedural inefficiencies (14%). Physician comfort levels with placing extubation orders varied significantly by seniority ( p < .001). Suggested solutions included standardized protocols (20%), adequate staffing (18%), and routine assessments (16%). Conclusions ICU healthcare professionals perceived delayed extubation as mainly associated with modifiable organizational and workflow-related barriers. Addressing these barriers through interprofessional collaboration, protocol standardization, and targeted training may optimize the extubation process and ultimately may inform future quality improvement initiatives in Saudi ICUs.

Canadian Journal of Respiratory TherapyVol. 62
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Taibah University (SA), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA), Sulaiman Al Rajhi Colleges (SA), Prince Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital (SA), Armed Forces Hospital (SA), Al-Azhar University (ID), North West Armed Forces Hospital (SA), Islamic University of Madinah (SA), Imperial College London (GB), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA), Jazan University (SA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.