Underestimation of the costs of owning and running a car
Car ownership and use appears less responsive to cost increases and income declines than might be expected, a pattern often attributed to habit formation and lifestyle adjustment. An additional explanation is that motorists may underestimate how much they spend on owning and running a car, but there is little empirical evidence testing this possibility. Using a representative sample of 801 motorists, we compare intuitive estimates of the annual motoring costs with detailed itemised expenditure across all major fixed (e.g., tax, insurance) and variable (e.g., fuel/charging, parking) costs over the same period. Total reported costs are almost 50% higher than motorists intuit. Median intuitive costs were €2,000, while median itemised costs were €2,923, excluding purchase price and depreciation. Most motorists (over 70%) exhibit this underestimation bias, with similar rates across engine types and socio-demographic groups. These findings are consistent with recall failures and salience bias when motorists consider the costs of owning and running a car, with potential implications for the persistence of car ownership. Improving the visibility and aggregation of motoring costs may complement fiscal and infrastructural measures aimed at supporting sustainable modal shift.
Authors
- Pete Lunn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7174-5320)
- Adam Joachim Shier
- Shane Timmons
Institutions
- Economic and Social Research Institute (IE)
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
- Published
- 2026-09-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105256
- Primary Topic
- Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00