Accuracy of Angiographic Identification of Culprit Lesions in Women With MINOCA

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) accounts for 6% to 15% of acute coronary syndromes and disproportionately affects women. Although coronary culprit lesions are present in 45% of patients with MINOCA, multivessel optical coherence tomography (OCT) is infrequently performed. We evaluated whether interventional cardiologists can identify coronary arteries with culprit lesions using invasive coronary angiography in women with MINOCA. METHODS: Women with MINOCA who had a coronary culprit lesion identified by multivessel OCT were included. A core laboratory confirmed and localized OCT-defined culprit lesions using angiographic coregistration. Two interventional cardiologists blinded to OCT findings independently reviewed invasive coronary angiography, before and after review of ECG and transthoracic echocardiography, to identify the culprit artery. RESULTS: Among 64 women with MINOCA (median age 64 years; 97% non-ST-segment elevation MI), OCT-defined culprit lesions were most frequently located in the left anterior descending (50.8%) or right coronary (35.4%) arteries. At least 1 interventional cardiologist identified the culprit artery in 54.7% of patients (95% CI, 42.6%–66.3%); both identified it in 28.1% (95% CI, 18.6%–40.1%). The addition of ECG and transthoracic echocardiography data did not improve accuracy ( P =0.40 and P =0.97). Culprit arteries were identified by at least 1 cardiologist in 87.5% of plaque rupture cases. Only 11% of circumflex lesions were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Interventional cardiologists could not reliably identify culprit arteries using coronary angiography in women with MINOCA, even after ECG and transthoracic echocardiography review. Our findings suggest that invasive angiography alone should not guide vessel selection for intracoronary imaging and support multivessel imaging when evaluating MINOCA. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02905357.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.126.016979
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Accuracy of Angiographic Identification of Culprit Lesions in Women With MINOCA

Nathaniel R. Smilowitz, Chang Yu, Anaïs Hausvater, Lindsay Elbaum et al.
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Accuracy of Angiographic Identification of Culprit Lesions in Women With MINOCA

Nathaniel R. Smilowitz, Chang Yu, Anaïs Hausvater, Lindsay Elbaum, Harmony R. Reynolds, Binita Shah, Jacqueline Saw, Akiko Maehara, Judith S. Hochman, Mitsuaki Matsumura, Elianna Shwayder, Tara Sedlak, Claudia Serrano Gomez, Vincent Li
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) accounts for 6% to 15% of acute coronary syndromes and disproportionately affects women. Although coronary culprit lesions are present in 45% of patients with MINOCA, multivessel optical coherence tomography (OCT) is infrequently performed. We evaluated whether interventional cardiologists can identify coronary arteries with culprit lesions using invasive coronary angiography in women with MINOCA. METHODS: Women with MINOCA who had a coronary culprit lesion identified by multivessel OCT were included. A core laboratory confirmed and localized OCT-defined culprit lesions using angiographic coregistration. Two interventional cardiologists blinded to OCT findings independently reviewed invasive coronary angiography, before and after review of ECG and transthoracic echocardiography, to identify the culprit artery. RESULTS: Among 64 women with MINOCA (median age 64 years; 97% non-ST-segment elevation MI), OCT-defined culprit lesions were most frequently located in the left anterior descending (50.8%) or right coronary (35.4%) arteries. At least 1 interventional cardiologist identified the culprit artery in 54.7% of patients (95% CI, 42.6%–66.3%); both identified it in 28.1% (95% CI, 18.6%–40.1%). The addition of ECG and transthoracic echocardiography data did not improve accuracy ( P =0.40 and P =0.97). Culprit arteries were identified by at least 1 cardiologist in 87.5% of plaque rupture cases. Only 11% of circumflex lesions were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Interventional cardiologists could not reliably identify culprit arteries using coronary angiography in women with MINOCA, even after ECG and transthoracic echocardiography review. Our findings suggest that invasive angiography alone should not guide vessel selection for intracoronary imaging and support multivessel imaging when evaluating MINOCA. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02905357.

Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), VA NY Harbor Healthcare System (US), Overlook Medical Center (US), Vancouver General Hospital (CA), Cardiovascular Research Foundation (US), Norwegian Womens Public Health Association (NO), Shirasagi Hospital (JP), New York University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.