The positive impact of logistics innovation development on firms' ESG performance: Evidence from China's pilot programs

As logistics networks play an increasingly prominent role in the global economy, the problems of high costs and high pollution they face have become increasingly severe. Against this backdrop, exploring the green development effect of logistics innovation policy is of great importance. This study regards China's pilot project for the innovative development of modern logistics cities (MLID) as a quasi-natural experiment. Based on data from A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2022, it systematically examines the impact of this logistics innovation policy on corporate ESG performance using a difference-in-differences approach. The study yields the following findings. First, logistics innovation and development can significantly improve corporate ESG performance. Decomposition into E, S, and G pillars shows that governance responds most strongly, environment moderately, and social the weakest. This reflects that governance is the most direct channel, while environmental and social gains may take longer to materialize. Second, channel analysis provides supportive evidence for three proposed pathways through which MLID may affect ESG performance, including digital transformation, supply chain risk governance, and resource allocation efficiency. Third, the positive impact is stronger for firms with higher policy exposure intensity, namely faster inventory turnover, higher logistics costs, or longer supply chain distances. In terms of contextual factors, the effect is more pronounced in regions with higher marketization, in industries with lower concentration, and in non-state-owned enterprises. Moreover, using firm-level substantive indicators including digital investment, carbon emissions, and training expenses, as well as city-level objective outcomes such as freight volume, urban carbon emissions, and traffic accidents, we find suggestive evidence that alleviates the concern that the observed ESG improvements are merely disclosure-driven. This study provides micro-level causal evidence from the intersection of macro logistics policy and corporate ESG, offering important policy implications for promoting green supply chains and sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Transportation Business & Management
Published
2026-09-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2026.101872
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The positive impact of logistics innovation development on firms' ESG performance: Evidence from China's pilot programs

Qianyi Li, Zhao Cheng, Shuhan Zhou, Yingying Zheng et al.
Research in Transportation Business & Management
Public Procurement and Policy
article

The positive impact of logistics innovation development on firms' ESG performance: Evidence from China's pilot programs

Qianyi Li, Zhao Cheng, Shuhan Zhou, Yingying Zheng, Guangpeng Bao
article en

Abstract

As logistics networks play an increasingly prominent role in the global economy, the problems of high costs and high pollution they face have become increasingly severe. Against this backdrop, exploring the green development effect of logistics innovation policy is of great importance. This study regards China's pilot project for the innovative development of modern logistics cities (MLID) as a quasi-natural experiment. Based on data from A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2022, it systematically examines the impact of this logistics innovation policy on corporate ESG performance using a difference-in-differences approach. The study yields the following findings. First, logistics innovation and development can significantly improve corporate ESG performance. Decomposition into E, S, and G pillars shows that governance responds most strongly, environment moderately, and social the weakest. This reflects that governance is the most direct channel, while environmental and social gains may take longer to materialize. Second, channel analysis provides supportive evidence for three proposed pathways through which MLID may affect ESG performance, including digital transformation, supply chain risk governance, and resource allocation efficiency. Third, the positive impact is stronger for firms with higher policy exposure intensity, namely faster inventory turnover, higher logistics costs, or longer supply chain distances. In terms of contextual factors, the effect is more pronounced in regions with higher marketization, in industries with lower concentration, and in non-state-owned enterprises. Moreover, using firm-level substantive indicators including digital investment, carbon emissions, and training expenses, as well as city-level objective outcomes such as freight volume, urban carbon emissions, and traffic accidents, we find suggestive evidence that alleviates the concern that the observed ESG improvements are merely disclosure-driven. This study provides micro-level causal evidence from the intersection of macro logistics policy and corporate ESG, offering important policy implications for promoting green supply chains and sustainable development.

Research in Transportation Business & ManagementVol. 69
Henan University (CN), Peking University (CN), Henan University of Economic and Law (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Public Procurement and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.