Healthcare Access for Adults with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity in Canada: A Descriptive Online Cross-Sectional Survey

Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) is a chronic condition characterized by adverse multisystem reactions triggered by chemical exposures, including at low levels. The use of fragranced and disinfectant products within healthcare institutions was frequently reported by individuals with MCS as a challenge to accessing healthcare. This study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, when infection control measures may have intensified the pre-existing chemical-exposure barriers for people with MCS. This study examines healthcare access among adults with MCS in Canada, including access to diagnosis and physicians and satisfaction with in-person and virtual care. A national cross-sectional online survey was conducted between January and February 2021 among adults living with MCS for at least one year prior to the pandemic. Quantitative and open-ended questions captured experiences related to diagnosis, access to physicians, and satisfaction with virtual and in-person healthcare. Of the 119 participants who completed the survey, most reported having a formal diagnosis of MCS (78.2%, n = 93, 95% CI 69.9–84.6). Among those who could not obtain an MCS diagnosis (N = 26), common barriers included obtaining any other diagnosis but MCS (61.5%, n = 16; 42.5–77.6), and the belief among medical professionals that MCS does not exist (57.7%, n = 15; 38.9–74.5). Among participants who gave reasons for dissatisfaction with virtual care (n = 32), 87.5% (71.9–95.0) cited the clinician’s lack of understanding of the condition, whereas technical problems were rarely reported (12.5%, 5.0–28.1). Among participants who reported dissatisfaction with in-person care (n = 41), 85.4% (71.6–93.1) cited the clinician’s lack of understanding of the condition, and 85.4% (71.6–93.1) cited chemical exposures, including scented disinfectants, soaps or sanitizers, while 80.5% (66.0–89.8) cited cleaning products on surfaces. Participants’ responses suggest that pandemic-related public health responses intensified pre-existing barriers to care for people with MCS by increasing chemical exposures and constraining access to knowledgeable providers. These findings highlight the need for healthcare systems and emergency preparedness frameworks that integrate chemical safety, disability inclusion, and provider education to ensure equitable access, including during public health crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph23091193
Primary Topic
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare Access for Adults with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity in Canada: A Descriptive Online Cross-Sectional Survey

Rohini Peris, John Molot, Riina Bray, Adrianna Trifunovski et al.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
article

Healthcare Access for Adults with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity in Canada: A Descriptive Online Cross-Sectional Survey

Rohini Peris, John Molot, Riina Bray, Adrianna Trifunovski, Nene A. Diallo
article en

Abstract

Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) is a chronic condition characterized by adverse multisystem reactions triggered by chemical exposures, including at low levels. The use of fragranced and disinfectant products within healthcare institutions was frequently reported by individuals with MCS as a challenge to accessing healthcare. This study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, when infection control measures may have intensified the pre-existing chemical-exposure barriers for people with MCS. This study examines healthcare access among adults with MCS in Canada, including access to diagnosis and physicians and satisfaction with in-person and virtual care. A national cross-sectional online survey was conducted between January and February 2021 among adults living with MCS for at least one year prior to the pandemic. Quantitative and open-ended questions captured experiences related to diagnosis, access to physicians, and satisfaction with virtual and in-person healthcare. Of the 119 participants who completed the survey, most reported having a formal diagnosis of MCS (78.2%, n = 93, 95% CI 69.9–84.6). Among those who could not obtain an MCS diagnosis (N = 26), common barriers included obtaining any other diagnosis but MCS (61.5%, n = 16; 42.5–77.6), and the belief among medical professionals that MCS does not exist (57.7%, n = 15; 38.9–74.5). Among participants who gave reasons for dissatisfaction with virtual care (n = 32), 87.5% (71.9–95.0) cited the clinician’s lack of understanding of the condition, whereas technical problems were rarely reported (12.5%, 5.0–28.1). Among participants who reported dissatisfaction with in-person care (n = 41), 85.4% (71.6–93.1) cited the clinician’s lack of understanding of the condition, and 85.4% (71.6–93.1) cited chemical exposures, including scented disinfectants, soaps or sanitizers, while 80.5% (66.0–89.8) cited cleaning products on surfaces. Participants’ responses suggest that pandemic-related public health responses intensified pre-existing barriers to care for people with MCS by increasing chemical exposures and constraining access to knowledgeable providers. These findings highlight the need for healthcare systems and emergency preparedness frameworks that integrate chemical safety, disability inclusion, and provider education to ensure equitable access, including during public health crises.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 23(9)
University of Ottawa (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Women's College Hospital (CA), Université du Québec (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.