Article 370 and the Constitutional Status of Jammu and Kashmir: Issues and Challenges

Article 370 of the Constitution of India, enacted as a provisional and transitory article, laid out the constitutional relationship between the former State of Jammu and Kashmir and the Union of India for more than seventy years. The objective of this paper is to trace the history of that relationship from the date of accession in 1947 until the abrogation of the special status of the State in August 2019 and further restructuring of the State into two Union Territories. Specifically, it analyses the judgement of the Supreme Court in In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution (2023), which validated the abrogation of Article 370, and highlights the constitutional and federal questions left unanswered, such as the correctness of modifying Article 370(3) through Article 367 of the Constitution, the impact of the judgement on asymmetrical federalism and the question of restoring statehood of the region. Legal validity does not necessarily mean constitutional propriety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22688491
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Article 370 and the Constitutional Status of Jammu and Kashmir: Issues and Challenges

Aditi Gupta, Dr. Prahalad
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
article

Article 370 and the Constitutional Status of Jammu and Kashmir: Issues and Challenges

Aditi Gupta, Dr. Prahalad
article en

Abstract

Article 370 of the Constitution of India, enacted as a provisional and transitory article, laid out the constitutional relationship between the former State of Jammu and Kashmir and the Union of India for more than seventy years. The objective of this paper is to trace the history of that relationship from the date of accession in 1947 until the abrogation of the special status of the State in August 2019 and further restructuring of the State into two Union Territories. Specifically, it analyses the judgement of the Supreme Court in In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution (2023), which validated the abrogation of Article 370, and highlights the constitutional and federal questions left unanswered, such as the correctness of modifying Article 370(3) through Article 367 of the Constitution, the impact of the judgement on asymmetrical federalism and the question of restoring statehood of the region. Legal validity does not necessarily mean constitutional propriety.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Article 370 and the Constitutional Status of Jammu and Kashmir: Issues and Challenges — Aditi Gupta, Dr. Prahalad · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS