Is taking a GLP-1 receptor agonist for weight loss “cheating”? A qualitative study of responses from a US census-matched panel

GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1s) have been shown to be effective for weight loss, but some research has suggested that their use may be perceived as “cheating” or “circumventing the effort” typically required for weight loss. This qualitative study examined such beliefs and attitudes. This was a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data. Data were collected from 450 US adults from Prolific benchmarked to US census values for age, sex, and race/ethnicity, yielding a usable sample of 348 responses. Two coders independently coded the data using the general inductive approach. Interrater reliability was computed using Krippendorff’s alpha, and codes with alpha < 0.7000 after four rounds were adjudicated by a third reviewer. Reviewers identified 17 codes with which to categorize the responses. More respondents wrote entries suggesting that GLP-1s are not cheating (43–50%) than they are (9–10%). Another common response focused on GLP-1s as a medical solution (33%). Negative perceptions of GLP-1s use often used a “moral framework” or applied caveats to their use (“acceptable if X has been tried first”). Areas of future research might include studying whether attitudes and beliefs about GLP-1s are associated with factors like profession or experiences of others within a social network.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Research Notes
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-026-08019-7
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is taking a GLP-1 receptor agonist for weight loss “cheating”? A qualitative study of responses from a US census-matched panel

Misty A.W. Hawkins, Monica Nair, Samara Useloff, Jon Agley
BMC Research Notes
Obesity and Health Practices
article

Is taking a GLP-1 receptor agonist for weight loss “cheating”? A qualitative study of responses from a US census-matched panel

Misty A.W. Hawkins, Monica Nair, Samara Useloff, Jon Agley
article en

Abstract

GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1s) have been shown to be effective for weight loss, but some research has suggested that their use may be perceived as “cheating” or “circumventing the effort” typically required for weight loss. This qualitative study examined such beliefs and attitudes. This was a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data. Data were collected from 450 US adults from Prolific benchmarked to US census values for age, sex, and race/ethnicity, yielding a usable sample of 348 responses. Two coders independently coded the data using the general inductive approach. Interrater reliability was computed using Krippendorff’s alpha, and codes with alpha < 0.7000 after four rounds were adjudicated by a third reviewer. Reviewers identified 17 codes with which to categorize the responses. More respondents wrote entries suggesting that GLP-1s are not cheating (43–50%) than they are (9–10%). Another common response focused on GLP-1s as a medical solution (33%). Negative perceptions of GLP-1s use often used a “moral framework” or applied caveats to their use (“acceptable if X has been tried first”). Areas of future research might include studying whether attitudes and beliefs about GLP-1s are associated with factors like profession or experiences of others within a social network.

BMC Research Notes
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.