Distorted Exegesis and Gregory of Nazianzus’ Poetic Response: A Revised Text and New Interpretation of Carm . II.1.39.1–24

Abstract This article argues that vocabulary drawn from Origen is crucial for understanding the opening section of Gregory’s poem On His Own Verses , a poem central to his self-conscious articulation of a classicizing Christian poetics. It also adopts a transposition proposed by Nigel G. Wilson and presents a revised text, together with a translation and commentary on selected passages. Gregory’s argument may be summarized as follows: he expresses regret that he did not advise people in time against attempting exegesis, since writing about God is not for most, who can at best reach only the literal or lower senses, which can never yield unassailable explanations of Scripture. Since the world is already full of heretical interpretations, one remaining response – by way of further disseminating sound readings of Scripture – is to recast part of his prose works in verse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philologus
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2026-0002
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distorted Exegesis and Gregory of Nazianzus’ Poetic Response: A Revised Text and New Interpretation of Carm . II.1.39.1–24

Christos Simelidis
Philologus
Byzantine Studies and History
article

Distorted Exegesis and Gregory of Nazianzus’ Poetic Response: A Revised Text and New Interpretation of Carm . II.1.39.1–24

Christos Simelidis
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article argues that vocabulary drawn from Origen is crucial for understanding the opening section of Gregory’s poem On His Own Verses , a poem central to his self-conscious articulation of a classicizing Christian poetics. It also adopts a transposition proposed by Nigel G. Wilson and presents a revised text, together with a translation and commentary on selected passages. Gregory’s argument may be summarized as follows: he expresses regret that he did not advise people in time against attempting exegesis, since writing about God is not for most, who can at best reach only the literal or lower senses, which can never yield unassailable explanations of Scripture. Since the world is already full of heretical interpretations, one remaining response – by way of further disseminating sound readings of Scripture – is to recast part of his prose works in verse.

Philologus
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.