No-Code and Low-Code Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Imaging: A Scoping Review

Introduction and aims The aim of this review was to evaluate applications, methodological characteristics, limitations and future directions of no-code, low-code and automated machine learning (LCNC/AutoML) approaches in healthcare imaging. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched using terms related to no-code artificial intelligence (AI), low-code AI, and AutoML combined with medical and dental imaging keywords. Studies were included if they applied LCNC or AutoML approaches to healthcare imaging tasks. Data extraction focused on platform type, imaging modality, clinical domain, task type and reported performance metrics. Results One-hundred thirty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria, including 127 medical and 11 dental imaging studies. Dental applications were limited to no-code platforms and focused on classification, object detection, and segmentation tasks, primarily involving caries detection, restoration identification and developmental staging. Medical imaging studies demonstrated broader adoption across specialties and imaging modalities, frequently employing AutoML or low-code frameworks for diagnostic and prognostic classification predominantly. Overall, LCNC/AutoML models showed promising performance, though external validation was inconsistently reported. Conclusions LCNC/AutoML platforms might enable clinician-driven AI development for imaging tasks in dentistry and screening-focused medical applications. While these approaches lower technical barriers and may mitigate distribution shift through localised model training and application, limitations related to generalisability, regulatory compliance and task complexity persist. LCNC/AutoML tools are best positioned as complementary, context-specific solutions rather than replacements for traditional AI development. Clinical relevance Accessible AI development platforms may facilitate broader clinician participation in imaging research and support the development of locally tailored diagnostic tools, particularly in resource-limited or emerging research environments such as dental imaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Dental Journal
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2026.109797
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

No-Code and Low-Code Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Imaging: A Scoping Review

Elsbeth Kalenderian, Zaid Badr, Marcel Reymus, Sergio Uribe et al.
1 citations
International Dental Journal
Dental Radiography and Imaging
7.87
article

No-Code and Low-Code Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Imaging: A Scoping Review

Elsbeth Kalenderian, Zaid Badr, Marcel Reymus, Sergio Uribe, Manal Hamdan, Falk Schwendicke
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction and aims The aim of this review was to evaluate applications, methodological characteristics, limitations and future directions of no-code, low-code and automated machine learning (LCNC/AutoML) approaches in healthcare imaging. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched using terms related to no-code artificial intelligence (AI), low-code AI, and AutoML combined with medical and dental imaging keywords. Studies were included if they applied LCNC or AutoML approaches to healthcare imaging tasks. Data extraction focused on platform type, imaging modality, clinical domain, task type and reported performance metrics. Results One-hundred thirty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria, including 127 medical and 11 dental imaging studies. Dental applications were limited to no-code platforms and focused on classification, object detection, and segmentation tasks, primarily involving caries detection, restoration identification and developmental staging. Medical imaging studies demonstrated broader adoption across specialties and imaging modalities, frequently employing AutoML or low-code frameworks for diagnostic and prognostic classification predominantly. Overall, LCNC/AutoML models showed promising performance, though external validation was inconsistently reported. Conclusions LCNC/AutoML platforms might enable clinician-driven AI development for imaging tasks in dentistry and screening-focused medical applications. While these approaches lower technical barriers and may mitigate distribution shift through localised model training and application, limitations related to generalisability, regulatory compliance and task complexity persist. LCNC/AutoML tools are best positioned as complementary, context-specific solutions rather than replacements for traditional AI development. Clinical relevance Accessible AI development platforms may facilitate broader clinician participation in imaging research and support the development of locally tailored diagnostic tools, particularly in resource-limited or emerging research environments such as dental imaging.

International Dental JournalVol. 76(6)
Marquette University (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), LMU Klinikum (DE), Riga Stradiņš University (LV), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
7.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.