Abrogation of Article 370: Legal Issues and Constitutional Perspective

Abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution of India on 5th August 2019 is among the most significant constitutional interventions made by the Indian Republic since its independence. Abrogation of this provision by a combination of a Presidential order under Article 370(1), reinterpretation of Article 367, and a Statutory Resolution passed by the Parliament functioning as the State legislature in President's Rule led to the termination of the special status conferred by Article 370 on the former State of Jammu and Kashmir, with the reorganization of the State into two Union Territories through the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019. This paper attempts to conduct a doctrinal analysis of legal and constitutional aspects pertaining to this abrogation, focusing on the historical background of Article 370, the constitutional means used to remove this provision and the Supreme Court's historic decision in In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution (2023). The paper also looks at this abrogation in the context of federalism, asymmetric federalism and the basic structure doctrine, and ends with a critique of the constitutional consequences of this decision.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22686854
Primary Topic
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Abrogation of Article 370: Legal Issues and Constitutional Perspective

Aditi Gupta, Dr. Prahalad
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
article

Abrogation of Article 370: Legal Issues and Constitutional Perspective

Aditi Gupta, Dr. Prahalad
article en

Abstract

Abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution of India on 5th August 2019 is among the most significant constitutional interventions made by the Indian Republic since its independence. Abrogation of this provision by a combination of a Presidential order under Article 370(1), reinterpretation of Article 367, and a Statutory Resolution passed by the Parliament functioning as the State legislature in President's Rule led to the termination of the special status conferred by Article 370 on the former State of Jammu and Kashmir, with the reorganization of the State into two Union Territories through the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019. This paper attempts to conduct a doctrinal analysis of legal and constitutional aspects pertaining to this abrogation, focusing on the historical background of Article 370, the constitutional means used to remove this provision and the Supreme Court's historic decision in In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution (2023). The paper also looks at this abrogation in the context of federalism, asymmetric federalism and the basic structure doctrine, and ends with a critique of the constitutional consequences of this decision.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
South Asian Studies and Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Abrogation of Article 370: Legal Issues and Constitutional Perspective — Aditi Gupta, Dr. Prahalad · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS