Defending liberty against democracy: the creation of the UK National Audit Office in 1983

Purpose This study examines the approach taken by the Thatcher government and its allies to the creation in 1984 of the UK's Supreme Audit Institution, the National Audit Office (NAO). It links this approach to negative liberty that contrasts to an alternative view, promoted by Thatcher's opponents in this debate, which focussed on the audit office as the guardian of neo-Roman liberty. Design/methodology/approach The issue of how we understand independence in audit institutions needs to be addressed. Independence has been addressed before, but often as a constitutional safeguard against the power of overmighty governments. This paper demonstrates a very different argument for audit independence which sees independence from democratic control as a vital barrier to the abuse of the rights of minorities by majorities. Findings The study shows how some politicians and officials supported audit reform in the 1980s in the UK as a mechanism to secure negative liberty. This contrasts with previous research that stressed the support of the founders of the NAO for neo-Roman liberty. Consequently, it is suggested that audit reform in the UK was the product of a compromise between politicians who believed in different and incompatible concepts of audit based on different and incompatible concepts of liberty. Research limitations/implications The concept of negative liberty extends the previous literature on liberty, its relationship to accountability, audit and accounting and has implications for how we see the neo-liberal origins of audit and New Public Management more generally. Practical implications The study has implications for public sector auditors and their awareness of the values which underpin their work. It demonstrates that while public sector audit can be non-partisan, it cannot be neutral between different values. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to consider the relationship between public sector audit and negative liberty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-10-2024-7449
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defending liberty against democracy: the creation of the UK National Audit Office in 1983

Henry Midgley, Laurence Ferry
Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Defending liberty against democracy: the creation of the UK National Audit Office in 1983

Henry Midgley, Laurence Ferry
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the approach taken by the Thatcher government and its allies to the creation in 1984 of the UK's Supreme Audit Institution, the National Audit Office (NAO). It links this approach to negative liberty that contrasts to an alternative view, promoted by Thatcher's opponents in this debate, which focussed on the audit office as the guardian of neo-Roman liberty. Design/methodology/approach The issue of how we understand independence in audit institutions needs to be addressed. Independence has been addressed before, but often as a constitutional safeguard against the power of overmighty governments. This paper demonstrates a very different argument for audit independence which sees independence from democratic control as a vital barrier to the abuse of the rights of minorities by majorities. Findings The study shows how some politicians and officials supported audit reform in the 1980s in the UK as a mechanism to secure negative liberty. This contrasts with previous research that stressed the support of the founders of the NAO for neo-Roman liberty. Consequently, it is suggested that audit reform in the UK was the product of a compromise between politicians who believed in different and incompatible concepts of audit based on different and incompatible concepts of liberty. Research limitations/implications The concept of negative liberty extends the previous literature on liberty, its relationship to accountability, audit and accounting and has implications for how we see the neo-liberal origins of audit and New Public Management more generally. Practical implications The study has implications for public sector auditors and their awareness of the values which underpin their work. It demonstrates that while public sector audit can be non-partisan, it cannot be neutral between different values. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to consider the relationship between public sector audit and negative liberty.

Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Durham University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.