Anti-Inflammatory and Antimicrobial Activities of Extracts Developed from Symphytum officinale Leaves, Flowers, and Roots: Experimental Evaluation and Molecular Docking Study
Symphytum officinale L. is traditional medicinal plant widely used for wound healing and bone regeneration; however, comparative studies evaluating the biological activities of extracts prepared from different plant organs remain limited. The present study compared the antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities of organ-specific S. officinale extracts and investigated their potential molecular mechanisms of bioactivities using molecular docking. Antimicrobial activity was evaluated against six bacterial reference strains by broth serial dilution, whereas anti-inflammatory activity was assessed in a serotonin-induced paw oedema model in rats together with the determination of serum prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and nitrotyrosine levels. Molecular docking was performed against bacterial peptide deformylases, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX). The 40% ethanolic leaf extract (S-7) and 70% ethanolic flower extract (S-13) exhibited the broadest antimicrobial spectrum, with pronounced activity against S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. coli, and L. monocytogenes. The 70% ethanolic leaf extract (S-8) demonstrated the strongest early anti-exudative activity (47.50%), whereas the 70% ethanolic flower extract (S-13) most effectively reduced PGE2, TNF-α, and nitrotyrosine levels. Molecular docking suggested that kaempferol-3-O-glucoside may be the principal contributor to antimicrobial activity through interactions with bacterial peptide deformylases, while hyperoside, isoquercitrin, and rosmarinic acid exhibited favourable interactions with COX-2 and 5-LOX, indicating their key role in exerting anti-inflammatory effects. These findings demonstrate pronounced organ-specific pharmacological differences among S. officinale extracts and identify hydroethanolic leaf, flower, and root extracts as promising candidates for further development as multitarget wound-healing phytopharmaceuticals.
Authors
- Ivo Laidmäe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5559-5476)
- V. V. Zazharskyi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2674-2494)
- Jyrki Heinämäki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5996-5144)
- Aіn Raal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8731-7366)
- О. І. Панасенко (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6102-3455)
- Mariia Shanaida (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1070-6739)
- Yu. V. Karpenko (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4390-9949)
- R. О. Shcherbyna (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9742-0284)
- Oleh Коshovyi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9545-8548)
- Getter Dolgošev
- Andrii Kaplaushenko (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3704-5539)
- Andriy Hotsulia
Institutions
- Zaporizhzhia State Medical and Pharmaceutical University (UA)
- Dnipro State Agrarian and Economic University (UA)
- I.Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University (UA)
- University of Tartu (EE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Published
- 2026-09-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27188060
- Primary Topic
- Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00