Assistive technology support systems and barriers to digital participation among students with visual impairment at the university of education, Winneba

Background Assistive technology is central to digital participation among students with visual impairment in higher education, but its educational value depends on the institutional, technical and pedagogical conditions that sustain its use. Objective This paper examined the assistive technology support systems available to students with visual impairment and the barriers shaping their digital participation at the University of Education, Winneba. Methods A qualitative case study design was employed. Data were generated through one semi-structured interview with a resource person, four focus group discussions with students with visual impairment, and seven overt observer-as-participant observation sessions. Data were analysed thematically. Results Institutional facilities, assistive technologies, peer networks and staff guidance enabled students to undertake digital academic activities. However, access remained uneven because formal training and technical support were limited, hardware and software were unreliable, some digital platforms and learning materials were inaccessible, and the cost of personal devices constrained independent use. Peer support and students’ combinations of mainstream and assistive technologies functioned as compensatory practices where formal systems were incomplete. Conclusion Digital participation at UEW is produced through an unstable combination of institutional provision and student compensation rather than through a fully coordinated accessibility system. Meaningful digital inclusion requires accessible platforms and materials, reliable infrastructure, sustained training, and clearly assigned institutional responsibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology and Disability
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10554181261488283
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assistive technology support systems and barriers to digital participation among students with visual impairment at the university of education, Winneba

Adam Awini, Farrouk Okyere
Technology and Disability
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
article

Assistive technology support systems and barriers to digital participation among students with visual impairment at the university of education, Winneba

Adam Awini, Farrouk Okyere
article en

Abstract

Background Assistive technology is central to digital participation among students with visual impairment in higher education, but its educational value depends on the institutional, technical and pedagogical conditions that sustain its use. Objective This paper examined the assistive technology support systems available to students with visual impairment and the barriers shaping their digital participation at the University of Education, Winneba. Methods A qualitative case study design was employed. Data were generated through one semi-structured interview with a resource person, four focus group discussions with students with visual impairment, and seven overt observer-as-participant observation sessions. Data were analysed thematically. Results Institutional facilities, assistive technologies, peer networks and staff guidance enabled students to undertake digital academic activities. However, access remained uneven because formal training and technical support were limited, hardware and software were unreliable, some digital platforms and learning materials were inaccessible, and the cost of personal devices constrained independent use. Peer support and students’ combinations of mainstream and assistive technologies functioned as compensatory practices where formal systems were incomplete. Conclusion Digital participation at UEW is produced through an unstable combination of institutional provision and student compensation rather than through a fully coordinated accessibility system. Meaningful digital inclusion requires accessible platforms and materials, reliable infrastructure, sustained training, and clearly assigned institutional responsibility.

Technology and Disability
University of Education, Winneba (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.