Diagnostic Indications and Endoscopic Correlates of Fecal Occult Blood Testing in Hospitalized Patients

Background: FOBT is widely used for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic populations but is frequently applied in hospitalized patients with anemia or suspected gastrointestinal bleeding despite limited supporting evidence. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical utility of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) in hospitalized patients, focusing on its indications and its association with endoscopic findings while accounting for differential endoscopic verification. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 160 hospitalized adults who underwent FOBT at a medium-complexity referral center. Demographic, clinical, and endoscopic data were extracted from electronic medical records. Group comparisons used Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-square, or Fisher’s exact tests; multivariable logistic regression, verification-bias-corrected diagnostic accuracy (Begg–Greenes method), and multiple imputation assessed the association between FOBT and endoscopic findings. Results: FOBT was positive in 61.3% of patients. Anemia was the main indication (51%), followed by melena (26%) and hematochezia (6.9%). FOBT positivity was significantly associated with anemia at admission (82% vs. 68%, p = 0.044) and hematochezia (10% vs. 0%, p = 0.007). Endoscopic verification differed markedly by the FOBT result (71% vs. 29%), and no significant association between FOBT positivity and abnormal endoscopic findings persisted after multivariable adjustment or bias correction, for either EGD (OR 2.01, 95%CI 0.66–6.10) or colonoscopy (OR 4.58, 95%CI 0.39–54.3). Conclusions: FOBT shows no robust diagnostic association with endoscopic pathology, upper or lower, once differential verification is accounted for. Its main actionable finding was frequent guideline-discordant use in patients with overt bleeding, identifying institutional stewardship as the primary target for improving diagnostic efficiency in inpatient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16182921
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Indications and Endoscopic Correlates of Fecal Occult Blood Testing in Hospitalized Patients

Henry Joseth González-Torres, Mileidys Correa Monterrosa, Mario Montoya Jaramillo, Alex Domínguez-Vargas et al.
Diagnostics
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Diagnostic Indications and Endoscopic Correlates of Fecal Occult Blood Testing in Hospitalized Patients

Henry Joseth González-Torres, Mileidys Correa Monterrosa, Mario Montoya Jaramillo, Alex Domínguez-Vargas, Ferney Samuel Contento-Anaya, Fabio Andres Contento-Anaya, Fernando Barros Gomez, Daniel Botero Alonso
article en

Abstract

Background: FOBT is widely used for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic populations but is frequently applied in hospitalized patients with anemia or suspected gastrointestinal bleeding despite limited supporting evidence. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical utility of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) in hospitalized patients, focusing on its indications and its association with endoscopic findings while accounting for differential endoscopic verification. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 160 hospitalized adults who underwent FOBT at a medium-complexity referral center. Demographic, clinical, and endoscopic data were extracted from electronic medical records. Group comparisons used Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-square, or Fisher’s exact tests; multivariable logistic regression, verification-bias-corrected diagnostic accuracy (Begg–Greenes method), and multiple imputation assessed the association between FOBT and endoscopic findings. Results: FOBT was positive in 61.3% of patients. Anemia was the main indication (51%), followed by melena (26%) and hematochezia (6.9%). FOBT positivity was significantly associated with anemia at admission (82% vs. 68%, p = 0.044) and hematochezia (10% vs. 0%, p = 0.007). Endoscopic verification differed markedly by the FOBT result (71% vs. 29%), and no significant association between FOBT positivity and abnormal endoscopic findings persisted after multivariable adjustment or bias correction, for either EGD (OR 2.01, 95%CI 0.66–6.10) or colonoscopy (OR 4.58, 95%CI 0.39–54.3). Conclusions: FOBT shows no robust diagnostic association with endoscopic pathology, upper or lower, once differential verification is accounted for. Its main actionable finding was frequent guideline-discordant use in patients with overt bleeding, identifying institutional stewardship as the primary target for improving diagnostic efficiency in inpatient care.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(18)
Universidad del Sinú (CO), Clínica Santa María (CO), Universidad Simón Bolívar (CO), Data Management (Italy) (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.