Can Nonprofits Gain an Advantage in Employee Retention Through Management Practices? A Comparative Lens for Managing Nonprofit Versus for‐Profit Employees

ABSTRACT Nonprofit organizations (NPOs) face growing competition for human capital from for‐profit organizations (FPOs). However, little research adopts a comparative lens to explore management practices that are associated with an advantage in retaining employees for NPOs relative to FPOs. Integrating resource orchestration theory and firm‐specific incentives theory, we contend that employee‐centered management practices (i.e., employee benefits, participation, and training) should be more effective in retaining NPO (versus FPO) employees. We tested our theory with four studies. The Preliminary Study documented that NPO employees rated their organization more positively than FPO employees when their organization implemented more employee‐centered management practices. Study 1 utilized archival survey data from Statistics Canada and showed that employee‐centered management practices were associated with lower voluntary turnover rates in NPOs (versus FPOs). Further, through Study 2, a qualitative study, we identified psychological contract fulfillment as a possible employee‐level mechanism that explained the observed differential effects for NPO versus FPO employees. We further tested this mechanism using scenario experiments in Study 3, finding support for the mediating role of psychological contract fulfillment. Our work suggests that NPOs may achieve an employee retention advantage over FPOs by aligning management practices with their institutional contexts and employee values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personnel Psychology
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.70042
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Can Nonprofits Gain an Advantage in Employee Retention Through Management Practices? A Comparative Lens for Managing Nonprofit Versus for‐Profit Employees

Zhefan Huang, Aaron Hill, Danielle D. van Jaarsveld, Yixuan Li et al.
Personnel Psychology
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

Can Nonprofits Gain an Advantage in Employee Retention Through Management Practices? A Comparative Lens for Managing Nonprofit Versus for‐Profit Employees

Zhefan Huang, Aaron Hill, Danielle D. van Jaarsveld, Yixuan Li, Mo Wang, Kaidi Wang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nonprofit organizations (NPOs) face growing competition for human capital from for‐profit organizations (FPOs). However, little research adopts a comparative lens to explore management practices that are associated with an advantage in retaining employees for NPOs relative to FPOs. Integrating resource orchestration theory and firm‐specific incentives theory, we contend that employee‐centered management practices (i.e., employee benefits, participation, and training) should be more effective in retaining NPO (versus FPO) employees. We tested our theory with four studies. The Preliminary Study documented that NPO employees rated their organization more positively than FPO employees when their organization implemented more employee‐centered management practices. Study 1 utilized archival survey data from Statistics Canada and showed that employee‐centered management practices were associated with lower voluntary turnover rates in NPOs (versus FPOs). Further, through Study 2, a qualitative study, we identified psychological contract fulfillment as a possible employee‐level mechanism that explained the observed differential effects for NPO versus FPO employees. We further tested this mechanism using scenario experiments in Study 3, finding support for the mediating role of psychological contract fulfillment. Our work suggests that NPOs may achieve an employee retention advantage over FPOs by aligning management practices with their institutional contexts and employee values.

Personnel Psychology
Tulane University (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Florida (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.