Formula-dependent LDL-C threshold classification and reporting uncertainty in the UK Biobank

Abstract Objectives Calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is widely reported, but formula-dependent estimation differences may alter classification near decision thresholds. We assessed formula-dependent LDL-C classification relative to direct LDL-C in UK Biobank and examined cardiovascular outcomes descriptively. Methods We analyzed 397,490 participants after quality-control exclusions and exclusion of those with missing direct LDL-C or triglycerides ≥4.52 mmol/L (≥400 mg/dL). Friedewald, Sampson-NIH, and Martin–Hopkins estimates were compared with the UK Biobank direct LDL-C comparator at a 2.60 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) method-comparison threshold. Analyses assessed threshold discordance, triglyceride strata, apolipoprotein B (apoB)/non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) phenotypes, threshold-window sensitivity analyses, and narrower atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) endpoints. Results Total threshold discordance was 5.96 % for Friedewald, 3.91 % for Sampson-NIH, and 3.23 % for Martin–Hopkins. Discordance increased with triglycerides. At 2.26–4.51 mmol/L (200–399 mg/dL), Friedewald had the largest negative calculated-minus-comparator difference and discordant low frequency (median difference −0.379 mmol/L; 12.9 %), whereas Martin–Hopkins had smaller differences (median −0.119 mmol/L; 4.3 %). Broad cardiovascular composite and narrower ASCVD endpoint models did not support binary threshold discordance as a stable adverse prognostic marker. Discordant low participants had higher triglycerides, body mass index (BMI), diabetes prevalence, and cholesterol-lowering medication use, but lower apoB and non-HDL-C. Conclusions LDL-C formula selection affected classification, especially in triglyceride-rich samples near 2.60 mmol/L (100 mg/dL). Calculated LDL-C may warrant interpretation as an estimate with formula-related uncertainty near decision thresholds; non-HDL-C and, where available, apoB may provide complementary information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-0687
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Formula-dependent LDL-C threshold classification and reporting uncertainty in the UK Biobank

Teng Ma, Cheng Shen, Liangyu Chu, Jin Li et al.
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Formula-dependent LDL-C threshold classification and reporting uncertainty in the UK Biobank

Teng Ma, Cheng Shen, Liangyu Chu, Jin Li, Wenting Yan, Bohao Xue, Xin Pan, Ningjian Wang, Yichen Ling, Dachun Xu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is widely reported, but formula-dependent estimation differences may alter classification near decision thresholds. We assessed formula-dependent LDL-C classification relative to direct LDL-C in UK Biobank and examined cardiovascular outcomes descriptively. Methods We analyzed 397,490 participants after quality-control exclusions and exclusion of those with missing direct LDL-C or triglycerides ≥4.52 mmol/L (≥400 mg/dL). Friedewald, Sampson-NIH, and Martin–Hopkins estimates were compared with the UK Biobank direct LDL-C comparator at a 2.60 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) method-comparison threshold. Analyses assessed threshold discordance, triglyceride strata, apolipoprotein B (apoB)/non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) phenotypes, threshold-window sensitivity analyses, and narrower atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) endpoints. Results Total threshold discordance was 5.96 % for Friedewald, 3.91 % for Sampson-NIH, and 3.23 % for Martin–Hopkins. Discordance increased with triglycerides. At 2.26–4.51 mmol/L (200–399 mg/dL), Friedewald had the largest negative calculated-minus-comparator difference and discordant low frequency (median difference −0.379 mmol/L; 12.9 %), whereas Martin–Hopkins had smaller differences (median −0.119 mmol/L; 4.3 %). Broad cardiovascular composite and narrower ASCVD endpoint models did not support binary threshold discordance as a stable adverse prognostic marker. Discordant low participants had higher triglycerides, body mass index (BMI), diabetes prevalence, and cholesterol-lowering medication use, but lower apoB and non-HDL-C. Conclusions LDL-C formula selection affected classification, especially in triglyceride-rich samples near 2.60 mmol/L (100 mg/dL). Calculated LDL-C may warrant interpretation as an estimate with formula-related uncertainty near decision thresholds; non-HDL-C and, where available, apoB may provide complementary information.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Second Military Medical University (CN), Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital (CN), Shanghai Pudong New Area Gongli Hospital (CN), Shenzhen Second People's Hospital (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.