Strength, Stiffness, and Poisson’s Ratio Measurements for Cements Used in the Well Completions for the Extended-Duration Gas Production Test on the Alaskan North Slope

Abstract As part of an extended-duration production test from a natural gas hydrate reservoir on the Alaska North Slope, a suite of optical-fiber sensors was encased in the completion cement to provide stable downhole monitoring around each of the four project wells. How the sensors respond to changes in the reservoir over time depends in part on properties of the LiteCRETE, ArcticCem, or Tuned Light cement in which each sensor is encased, and on how well the cement bonded to the well casing, sensors, and sediment formation. Here, we report on physical properties of the cements (compressive and tensile strength, stiffness, and Poisson’s ratio), on the downhole distribution of the cements used in each well, and on the cement bond quality. Physical property measurements are presented for cements sampled during the completion activities for the three wells completed in 2022–2023. Samples were cured while being submerged in water at 2–4 °C, then tested at intervals from ∼30 days to more than one year. After an initial period of rapid increase, cement strengths largely stabilized around 120 days in all cases, meaning that cements in all wells reached their nominal strength plateau four months or more before the production test began. Calculations based on recorded volumes of pumped cement show the subpermafrost, main hole portion of each well is encased only in the higher-density “tail” cement used in that well. Downhole cement evaluation logs from two wells demonstrate how the presence of sensors and other hardware outside the casing interferes with the cement evaluation assessment. Nonetheless, the cement evaluations indicate a generally good bond with the formation and sensors over the gas hydrate reservoir intervals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c04832
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Strength, Stiffness, and Poisson’s Ratio Measurements for Cements Used in the Well Completions for the Extended-Duration Gas Production Test on the Alaskan North Slope

Jun Yoneda, Timothy S. Collett, William F. Waite, Jim Kirksey et al.
1 citations
Energy & Fuels
Drilling and Well Engineering
3.53
article

Strength, Stiffness, and Poisson’s Ratio Measurements for Cements Used in the Well Completions for the Extended-Duration Gas Production Test on the Alaskan North Slope

Jun Yoneda, Timothy S. Collett, William F. Waite, Jim Kirksey, Adrian V. Garcia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract As part of an extended-duration production test from a natural gas hydrate reservoir on the Alaska North Slope, a suite of optical-fiber sensors was encased in the completion cement to provide stable downhole monitoring around each of the four project wells. How the sensors respond to changes in the reservoir over time depends in part on properties of the LiteCRETE, ArcticCem, or Tuned Light cement in which each sensor is encased, and on how well the cement bonded to the well casing, sensors, and sediment formation. Here, we report on physical properties of the cements (compressive and tensile strength, stiffness, and Poisson’s ratio), on the downhole distribution of the cements used in each well, and on the cement bond quality. Physical property measurements are presented for cements sampled during the completion activities for the three wells completed in 2022–2023. Samples were cured while being submerged in water at 2–4 °C, then tested at intervals from ∼30 days to more than one year. After an initial period of rapid increase, cement strengths largely stabilized around 120 days in all cases, meaning that cements in all wells reached their nominal strength plateau four months or more before the production test began. Calculations based on recorded volumes of pumped cement show the subpermafrost, main hole portion of each well is encased only in the higher-density “tail” cement used in that well. Downhole cement evaluation logs from two wells demonstrate how the presence of sensors and other hardware outside the casing interferes with the cement evaluation assessment. Nonetheless, the cement evaluations indicate a generally good bond with the formation and sensors over the gas hydrate reservoir intervals.

Energy & Fuels
United States Geological Survey (US), Inova Loudoun Hospital (US), Golder Associates (United States) (US), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Drilling and Well Engineering
3.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.