LINGUOPRAGMATIC TRANSFORMATIONS OF INDIRECT REFUSALS IN ENGLISH, RUSSIAN AND UZBEK

This article examines indirect refusals as a pragmatic phenomenon in English literary dialogues and considers the ways in which their communicative meanings may be transformed in Russian and Uzbek translations. Particular attention is paid to the relationship between linguistic form and illocutionary force, since a refusal is not necessarily expressed by an explicit negative response. Reasons, apologies, expressions of inability, modal constructions, hesitation, alternatives, topic shifts, rhetorical questions and other indirect devices may perform the communicative function of refusal. The article argues that the translation of indirect refusals requires the preservation not only of propositional meaning but also of pragmatic force, degree of mitigation, interpersonal distance and communicative intention.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22684748
Primary Topic
Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

LINGUOPRAGMATIC TRANSFORMATIONS OF INDIRECT REFUSALS IN ENGLISH, RUSSIAN AND UZBEK

Madaliyeva Mohira Muxammadaminovna
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
article

LINGUOPRAGMATIC TRANSFORMATIONS OF INDIRECT REFUSALS IN ENGLISH, RUSSIAN AND UZBEK

Madaliyeva Mohira Muxammadaminovna
article en

Abstract

This article examines indirect refusals as a pragmatic phenomenon in English literary dialogues and considers the ways in which their communicative meanings may be transformed in Russian and Uzbek translations. Particular attention is paid to the relationship between linguistic form and illocutionary force, since a refusal is not necessarily expressed by an explicit negative response. Reasons, apologies, expressions of inability, modal constructions, hesitation, alternatives, topic shifts, rhetorical questions and other indirect devices may perform the communicative function of refusal. The article argues that the translation of indirect refusals requires the preservation not only of propositional meaning but also of pragmatic force, degree of mitigation, interpersonal distance and communicative intention.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.