Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy for Patients With Concomitant Head Trauma: A Propensity Score–Matched and Machine Learning Study

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for patients with large vessel occlusion stroke presenting with concomitant head trauma is unclear. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database in the United States (2016–2022), we identified adults with nonelective admissions for large vessel occlusion stroke and concurrent head trauma. Patients who underwent EVT were compared with patients who did not undergo EVT using 1:1 propensity score matching. A causal forest machine learning model was deployed to estimate individual-level conditional average treatment effects for excellent neurological outcomes, with Shapley Additive Explanation values quantifying variable importance. RESULTS: Of 15 527 patients with large vessel occlusion stroke large vessel occlusion stroke with concomitant head trauma (median age, 78 years; 52.6% female; 51.6% with superficial injury), 2750 (17.7%) received EVT; propensity score matching yielded 2616 balanced pairs. After matching, EVT was associated with significantly higher rates of excellent outcomes (19.0% versus 13.7%; P =0.002) with no difference in mortality (14.6% versus 14.7%; P =0.93). In causal forest analysis, younger age, higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, lack of intravenous thrombolysis, and lack of altered mental status emerged as the strongest drivers of larger treatment benefit, and patients were dichotomized into EVT-favorable (n=8097) and EVT-unfavorable (n=7430) subgroups. In the favorable subgroup, EVT was associated with higher routine discharge (25.7% versus 21.5%; P =0.01); in the unfavorable subgroup, EVT conferred no benefit in routine discharge (10.0% versus 11.7%; P =0.26) but was associated with higher mortality (19.0% versus 14.0%; P =0.004). CONCLUSIONS: EVT is overall associated with higher rates of favorable discharge outcomes; however, treatment effect heterogeneity is substantial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.126.002448
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy for Patients With Concomitant Head Trauma: A Propensity Score–Matched and Machine Learning Study

Ajay Malhotra, Dhairya A. Lakhani, Dheeraj Gandhi, Marco Colasurdo et al.
Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy for Patients With Concomitant Head Trauma: A Propensity Score–Matched and Machine Learning Study

Ajay Malhotra, Dhairya A. Lakhani, Dheeraj Gandhi, Marco Colasurdo, Huanwen Chen, Matthew K McIntyre, Adam Awad
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for patients with large vessel occlusion stroke presenting with concomitant head trauma is unclear. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database in the United States (2016–2022), we identified adults with nonelective admissions for large vessel occlusion stroke and concurrent head trauma. Patients who underwent EVT were compared with patients who did not undergo EVT using 1:1 propensity score matching. A causal forest machine learning model was deployed to estimate individual-level conditional average treatment effects for excellent neurological outcomes, with Shapley Additive Explanation values quantifying variable importance. RESULTS: Of 15 527 patients with large vessel occlusion stroke large vessel occlusion stroke with concomitant head trauma (median age, 78 years; 52.6% female; 51.6% with superficial injury), 2750 (17.7%) received EVT; propensity score matching yielded 2616 balanced pairs. After matching, EVT was associated with significantly higher rates of excellent outcomes (19.0% versus 13.7%; P =0.002) with no difference in mortality (14.6% versus 14.7%; P =0.93). In causal forest analysis, younger age, higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, lack of intravenous thrombolysis, and lack of altered mental status emerged as the strongest drivers of larger treatment benefit, and patients were dichotomized into EVT-favorable (n=8097) and EVT-unfavorable (n=7430) subgroups. In the favorable subgroup, EVT was associated with higher routine discharge (25.7% versus 21.5%; P =0.01); in the unfavorable subgroup, EVT conferred no benefit in routine discharge (10.0% versus 11.7%; P =0.26) but was associated with higher mortality (19.0% versus 14.0%; P =0.004). CONCLUSIONS: EVT is overall associated with higher rates of favorable discharge outcomes; however, treatment effect heterogeneity is substantial.

Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
West Virginia University (US), Yale New Haven Hospital (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Blanchette Rockefeller Neurosciences Institute (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.