Understanding the Use of Community Advisory Boards in Autism Research: A Scoping Review

Abstract Community engagement is increasingly promoted as a good practice in autism research, yet little is known about how Community Advisory Boards are used. This scoping review mapped the extent and nature of empirical literature on Community Advisory Boards in autism research. Five databases were searched, supplemented by reference list searching. Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria. Most were published recently, conducted in the United States, and used mixed methods. Community Advisory Boards were rarely formally defined and were typically described functionally rather than conceptually. Most operated in consultative roles, with inconsistent reporting of recruitment, compensation, onboarding, communication, and influence on decision-making. Findings suggest that use of Community Advisory Boards in autism research is expanding but remains conceptually and methodologically underdeveloped.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-026-00590-w
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Understanding the Use of Community Advisory Boards in Autism Research: A Scoping Review

Margaret Janse van Rensburg, Alexia Ostrolenk, Valérie Courchesne, Courtney Weaver et al.
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Understanding the Use of Community Advisory Boards in Autism Research: A Scoping Review

Margaret Janse van Rensburg, Alexia Ostrolenk, Valérie Courchesne, Courtney Weaver, Elisa Niunin, Robert M. Hock, Anja Wilson, Sydney Arsenault
article en

Abstract

Abstract Community engagement is increasingly promoted as a good practice in autism research, yet little is known about how Community Advisory Boards are used. This scoping review mapped the extent and nature of empirical literature on Community Advisory Boards in autism research. Five databases were searched, supplemented by reference list searching. Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria. Most were published recently, conducted in the United States, and used mixed methods. Community Advisory Boards were rarely formally defined and were typically described functionally rather than conceptually. Most operated in consultative roles, with inconsistent reporting of recruitment, compensation, onboarding, communication, and influence on decision-making. Findings suggest that use of Community Advisory Boards in autism research is expanding but remains conceptually and methodologically underdeveloped.

Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
University of South Carolina (US), Columbia College - South Carolina (US), Université de Montréal (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.