No significant changes in synaptic density and gray matter volume following motor learning—a pilot study

Abstract In animal neurophysiology, motor learning induces long-term potentiation- and depression-like plasticity. In humans, gray matter volume (GMV) changes, measured non-invasively by MRI, in response to motor learning are interpreted as a surrogate measure of plasticity. Here we measure synaptic density with positron emission tomography (PET) to investigate the learning-induced synaptic plasticity more directly, and MRI-based GMV to investigate structural plasticity. In this pilot study, twenty-two volunteers participated in a simple or complex (group factor) four-week motor training on a bimanual tracking task. Learning progress was modelled individually. [ 18 F]SynVesT-1 PET and T1-weighted MRI were acquired at baseline (PRE) and immediately after the motor training (POST), and at MID for MRI only (time factor). Average standard uptake value ratios (SUVR), GMV and average cortical thickness in six a priori chosen VOIs of the visuomotor network were statistically compared over time, group and time-by-group, and associated with learning. Participants’ performance improved significantly, and more for the complex than the simple training group. The VOI-based PET and GM analyses did not yield any significant results. In this pilot study, we did not identify significant changes in [ 18 F]SynVesT-1 synaptic density as a surrogate marker for plasticity after motor learning in the a priori chosen VOIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Science of Learning
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00451-5
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No significant changes in synaptic density and gray matter volume following motor learning—a pilot study

Melina Hehl, Takuya Toyonaga, Patrick Dupont, Koen Van Laere et al.
npj Science of Learning
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

No significant changes in synaptic density and gray matter volume following motor learning—a pilot study

Melina Hehl, Takuya Toyonaga, Patrick Dupont, Koen Van Laere, Stephan P. Swinnen, Koen Cuypers, Richard E. Carson
article en

Abstract

Abstract In animal neurophysiology, motor learning induces long-term potentiation- and depression-like plasticity. In humans, gray matter volume (GMV) changes, measured non-invasively by MRI, in response to motor learning are interpreted as a surrogate measure of plasticity. Here we measure synaptic density with positron emission tomography (PET) to investigate the learning-induced synaptic plasticity more directly, and MRI-based GMV to investigate structural plasticity. In this pilot study, twenty-two volunteers participated in a simple or complex (group factor) four-week motor training on a bimanual tracking task. Learning progress was modelled individually. [ 18 F]SynVesT-1 PET and T1-weighted MRI were acquired at baseline (PRE) and immediately after the motor training (POST), and at MID for MRI only (time factor). Average standard uptake value ratios (SUVR), GMV and average cortical thickness in six a priori chosen VOIs of the visuomotor network were statistically compared over time, group and time-by-group, and associated with learning. Participants’ performance improved significantly, and more for the complex than the simple training group. The VOI-based PET and GM analyses did not yield any significant results. In this pilot study, we did not identify significant changes in [ 18 F]SynVesT-1 synaptic density as a surrogate marker for plasticity after motor learning in the a priori chosen VOIs.

npj Science of Learning
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE), Yale University (US), Hasselt University (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.