Seeking Common Ground While Respecting Differences

This study aimed to systematize and validate a conflict resolution framework for Thai Sunni Muslims, particularly the Salaf, based on Muhammad Rashid Rida’s principle of “seeking common ground while respecting differences.” The framework was first constructed through normative systematization based on qualitative analysis of primary Islamic sources—the Qurʾān, Ḥadīth, and Rida’s works—alongside historical and contemporary scholarly texts, ensuring alignment with the methodology of Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaʿah. To test its practicality, five public online conflicts involving Thai Salafi scholars on social media and television were examined through the framework. Findings from the case studies were subjected to expert validation, which was conducted through in-depth interviews with four purposively selected expert Thai Salafi scholars, each with over twenty-five years of teaching and leadership experience. While suggesting conditions for its application, the experts confirmed the framework’s relevance and applicability to solve issues of permissible disagreement among the Salafi community. Overall, the study illustrates a double validation process through practical cases and expert validation and shows that Rida’s principle, though often considered modern, is consistent with classical Sunni methodology distinguishing core beliefs from secondary issues, as well as consensus from interpretive reasoning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18848/2154-8633/cgp/a538
Primary Topic
Conflict Management and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seeking Common Ground While Respecting Differences

Santhad Borna
The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society
Conflict Management and Negotiation
article

Seeking Common Ground While Respecting Differences

Santhad Borna
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to systematize and validate a conflict resolution framework for Thai Sunni Muslims, particularly the Salaf, based on Muhammad Rashid Rida’s principle of “seeking common ground while respecting differences.” The framework was first constructed through normative systematization based on qualitative analysis of primary Islamic sources—the Qurʾān, Ḥadīth, and Rida’s works—alongside historical and contemporary scholarly texts, ensuring alignment with the methodology of Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaʿah. To test its practicality, five public online conflicts involving Thai Salafi scholars on social media and television were examined through the framework. Findings from the case studies were subjected to expert validation, which was conducted through in-depth interviews with four purposively selected expert Thai Salafi scholars, each with over twenty-five years of teaching and leadership experience. While suggesting conditions for its application, the experts confirmed the framework’s relevance and applicability to solve issues of permissible disagreement among the Salafi community. Overall, the study illustrates a double validation process through practical cases and expert validation and shows that Rida’s principle, though often considered modern, is consistent with classical Sunni methodology distinguishing core beliefs from secondary issues, as well as consensus from interpretive reasoning.

The International Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Society
Mahidol University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Conflict Management and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.