Comparative Efficacy of Diquafosol, Rebamipide, and Carboxymethylcellulose in Patients with Pre-existing Dry Eye Disease Undergoing Cataract Surgery

Purpose: To compare the clinical efficacy of 3% diquafosol, 2% rebamipide, and 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) in patients with pre-existing dry eye disease (DED) undergoing cataract surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included 75 eyes of 75 patients with DED undergoing cataract surgery, divided into diquafosol (n=25), rebamipide (n=25), and CMC (n=25, control) groups based on prescribed eye drops, administered four times daily from 2 weeks before surgery to 4 weeks after surgery. Tear film break-up time (TBUT), ocular surface staining, meibomian gland secretion (MGS), lid margin telangiectasia, Schirmer test, and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) were evaluated preoperatively and at 4 weeks postoperatively. Results: All parameters improved significantly in all groups at 4 weeks (all p<0.001). Diquafosol showed greater improvement than CMC in TBUT and OSDI (p=0.001 and <0.001), and greater TBUT improvement than rebamipide (p=0.017); the difference in corneal staining did not reach significance in the overall three-group comparison (p=0.053). Rebamipide showed greater improvement than CMC in MGS (p=0.018), lid margin telangiectasia (p<0.001), Schirmer test (p=0.005), and OSDI (p=0.001), and greater improvement than diquafosol in lid margin telangiectasia and Schirmer test (p=0.002 and 0.036, respectively). Conclusions: Both diquafosol and rebamipide were more effective than CMC in stabilizing the ocular surface after cataract surgery in patients with pre-existing DED. Diquafosol is advantageous for rapid tear film stabilization, whereas rebamipide is associated with greater improvement in eyelid margin telangiectasia grade and meibomian gland secretory function, suggesting that perioperative eye drop selection should be individualized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2026.0118
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparative Efficacy of Diquafosol, Rebamipide, and Carboxymethylcellulose in Patients with Pre-existing Dry Eye Disease Undergoing Cataract Surgery

Myung Ho Cho, Jong Soo Lee, Jae Hyun Kim
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
article

Comparative Efficacy of Diquafosol, Rebamipide, and Carboxymethylcellulose in Patients with Pre-existing Dry Eye Disease Undergoing Cataract Surgery

Myung Ho Cho, Jong Soo Lee, Jae Hyun Kim
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the clinical efficacy of 3% diquafosol, 2% rebamipide, and 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) in patients with pre-existing dry eye disease (DED) undergoing cataract surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included 75 eyes of 75 patients with DED undergoing cataract surgery, divided into diquafosol (n=25), rebamipide (n=25), and CMC (n=25, control) groups based on prescribed eye drops, administered four times daily from 2 weeks before surgery to 4 weeks after surgery. Tear film break-up time (TBUT), ocular surface staining, meibomian gland secretion (MGS), lid margin telangiectasia, Schirmer test, and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) were evaluated preoperatively and at 4 weeks postoperatively. Results: All parameters improved significantly in all groups at 4 weeks (all p<0.001). Diquafosol showed greater improvement than CMC in TBUT and OSDI (p=0.001 and <0.001), and greater TBUT improvement than rebamipide (p=0.017); the difference in corneal staining did not reach significance in the overall three-group comparison (p=0.053). Rebamipide showed greater improvement than CMC in MGS (p=0.018), lid margin telangiectasia (p<0.001), Schirmer test (p=0.005), and OSDI (p=0.001), and greater improvement than diquafosol in lid margin telangiectasia and Schirmer test (p=0.002 and 0.036, respectively). Conclusions: Both diquafosol and rebamipide were more effective than CMC in stabilizing the ocular surface after cataract surgery in patients with pre-existing DED. Diquafosol is advantageous for rapid tear film stabilization, whereas rebamipide is associated with greater improvement in eyelid margin telangiectasia grade and meibomian gland secretory function, suggesting that perioperative eye drop selection should be individualized.

Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
Pusan National University Hospital (KR), Pusan National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Efficacy of Diquafosol, Rebamipide, and Carboxymethylcellulose in Patients with Pre-existing Dry Eye Disease Undergoing Cataract Surgery — Myung Ho Cho, Jong Soo Lee, et al. · Korean Journal of Ophthalmology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS