Applying Natural Language Processing to Address Healthcare Bias: Using CARE-SD to Evaluate the Distribution of Stigmatizing Language in Clinical Notes

Electronic health records (EHRs) are a critical medium through which patient stigmatization is perpetuated among healthcare teams. We identified doubt markers and stigmatizing labels in MIMIC-III, a de-identified EHR, via expanded lexicon matching and machine learning classifiers. Predictors of rates of linguistic features were assessed using Poisson models. We found higher rates of stigmatizing labels per chart among patients who were Black or African American (RR: 1.16), patients with Medicare/Medicaid or government-run insurance (RR: 2.46), self-pay (RR: 2.12), and patients with a variety of stigmatizing disease and mental health conditions (RR: 1.50–4.90). Patterns among doubt markers were similar, though male patients had higher rates of doubt markers (RR: 1.25). We found increased stigmatizing labels used by nurses (RR: 1.40), and social workers (RR: 2.25), with similar patterns of doubt markers. Stigmatizing language occurred at higher rates among historically stigmatized patients, perpetuated by multiple provider types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08797-2
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying Natural Language Processing to Address Healthcare Bias: Using CARE-SD to Evaluate the Distribution of Stigmatizing Language in Clinical Notes

Swati Rajwal, Andrew Walker, Melvin Livingston, Jennifer Love et al.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Applying Natural Language Processing to Address Healthcare Bias: Using CARE-SD to Evaluate the Distribution of Stigmatizing Language in Clinical Notes

Swati Rajwal, Andrew Walker, Melvin Livingston, Jennifer Love, Hannah Cooper, Isabel Walker, Abeed Sarker
article en

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) are a critical medium through which patient stigmatization is perpetuated among healthcare teams. We identified doubt markers and stigmatizing labels in MIMIC-III, a de-identified EHR, via expanded lexicon matching and machine learning classifiers. Predictors of rates of linguistic features were assessed using Poisson models. We found higher rates of stigmatizing labels per chart among patients who were Black or African American (RR: 1.16), patients with Medicare/Medicaid or government-run insurance (RR: 2.46), self-pay (RR: 2.12), and patients with a variety of stigmatizing disease and mental health conditions (RR: 1.50–4.90). Patterns among doubt markers were similar, though male patients had higher rates of doubt markers (RR: 1.25). We found increased stigmatizing labels used by nurses (RR: 1.40), and social workers (RR: 2.25), with similar patterns of doubt markers. Stigmatizing language occurred at higher rates among historically stigmatized patients, perpetuated by multiple provider types.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Children's Hospital of Los Angeles (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), Emory University (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.