Evaluation of volumetric DBS for lead analysis using ICP-MS/MS: addressing matrix effects and hematocrit variability

BACKGROUND: Lead testing in dried blood spots (DBS) offer a convenient alternative to venous blood draw; however, its adoption has been limited by variable extraction efficiency, matrix effects, and hematocrit-dependent recovery. To mitigate these challenges, we explored the utility of volumetric DBS (vDBS) cards, which are known to deposit a fixed volume of blood that gets analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples (quality control, proficiency testing, lead spiked, and patient samples that were positive for lead) were pipetted onto the backs of vDBS cards. Extracts were analyzed using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in collision/reaction cell mode with oxygen gas. Deming regression analyses evaluated whole blood and vDBS analyzed with aqueous calibrators; vDBS analyzed with aqueous and DBS calibrators. Samples with varying hematocrit were assessed for impact on recovery. RESULTS: = 119) prepared from previously tested and lead spiked samples, analyzed against aqueous calibrators and vDBS calibrators, showed linear results: slope 1.024 (95% CI: 0.998 to 1.051) and y-intercept -0.0204 (95% CI: -0.4287 to 0.3879). Bias noted between whole blood lead and vDBS lead samples with varying hematocrit levels was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: vDBS can be analyzed without matrix-matched calibrators to simplify routine assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioanalysis
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2026.2728919
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of volumetric DBS for lead analysis using ICP-MS/MS: addressing matrix effects and hematocrit variability

Rejwi A. Dahal, Michelle K. Zimmerman, Kavita Umrau, Joshua Kocemba et al.
Bioanalysis
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

Evaluation of volumetric DBS for lead analysis using ICP-MS/MS: addressing matrix effects and hematocrit variability

Rejwi A. Dahal, Michelle K. Zimmerman, Kavita Umrau, Joshua Kocemba, John O. Ogunbileje, Halimat S. Olaniyan, Gillian Coultas
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lead testing in dried blood spots (DBS) offer a convenient alternative to venous blood draw; however, its adoption has been limited by variable extraction efficiency, matrix effects, and hematocrit-dependent recovery. To mitigate these challenges, we explored the utility of volumetric DBS (vDBS) cards, which are known to deposit a fixed volume of blood that gets analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples (quality control, proficiency testing, lead spiked, and patient samples that were positive for lead) were pipetted onto the backs of vDBS cards. Extracts were analyzed using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in collision/reaction cell mode with oxygen gas. Deming regression analyses evaluated whole blood and vDBS analyzed with aqueous calibrators; vDBS analyzed with aqueous and DBS calibrators. Samples with varying hematocrit were assessed for impact on recovery. RESULTS: = 119) prepared from previously tested and lead spiked samples, analyzed against aqueous calibrators and vDBS calibrators, showed linear results: slope 1.024 (95% CI: 0.998 to 1.051) and y-intercept -0.0204 (95% CI: -0.4287 to 0.3879). Bias noted between whole blood lead and vDBS lead samples with varying hematocrit levels was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: vDBS can be analyzed without matrix-matched calibrators to simplify routine assessment.

Bioanalysis
University School (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.