Dot-by-dot wire arc additive manufacturing geometry prediction: an analytical model

Abstract Dot-by-dot Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (DBD-WAAM) is a deposition strategy for manufacturing complex, large-scale metal lattice structures through the successive deposition of individual molten droplets. In this process, precise geometry prediction is essential for high-precision toolpath definition, as even minor errors in dot height and diameter can compromise welding toolpath strategies and the mechanical properties of the printed components, as these inaccuracies propagate and amplify throughout the final structure. Physics-based analytical geometrical models offer significant benefits over experimental ones, providing generalizable solutions across various materials and parameter configurations without requiring extensive experimental characterization. However, while some analytical models have been developed for traditional bead-based WAAM, current DBD-WAAM research lacks such approaches, relying mostly on regressive experimental techniques. This study fills this gap by proposing a physics-based analytical model using heat conduction and mass conservation principles. Validated through 11 case studies involving steel and titanium bars, the model initially yielded absolute percentage errors generally below 20% using constant literature arc efficiency (i.e., a priori accuracy), providing a useful baseline for preliminary process screening. However, experimental validation showed that the highest errors are related to low deposition time and current, which suggests that in such conditions arc efficiency significantly changes. Specifically, with trial-and-error variable arc efficiency values, the model showed accuracy with overall errors below 8% (i.e., calibrated accuracy). These findings demonstrate the model's utility for initial feasibility assessment via a priori estimates, while highlighting the necessity of calibrated efficiency for precise toolpath generation and process repeatability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-026-19069-3
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Dot-by-dot wire arc additive manufacturing geometry prediction: an analytical model

Niccolò Grossi, Antonio Scippa, Lorenzo Morelli, Guido Pierattini
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Dot-by-dot wire arc additive manufacturing geometry prediction: an analytical model

Niccolò Grossi, Antonio Scippa, Lorenzo Morelli, Guido Pierattini
article en

Abstract

Abstract Dot-by-dot Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (DBD-WAAM) is a deposition strategy for manufacturing complex, large-scale metal lattice structures through the successive deposition of individual molten droplets. In this process, precise geometry prediction is essential for high-precision toolpath definition, as even minor errors in dot height and diameter can compromise welding toolpath strategies and the mechanical properties of the printed components, as these inaccuracies propagate and amplify throughout the final structure. Physics-based analytical geometrical models offer significant benefits over experimental ones, providing generalizable solutions across various materials and parameter configurations without requiring extensive experimental characterization. However, while some analytical models have been developed for traditional bead-based WAAM, current DBD-WAAM research lacks such approaches, relying mostly on regressive experimental techniques. This study fills this gap by proposing a physics-based analytical model using heat conduction and mass conservation principles. Validated through 11 case studies involving steel and titanium bars, the model initially yielded absolute percentage errors generally below 20% using constant literature arc efficiency (i.e., a priori accuracy), providing a useful baseline for preliminary process screening. However, experimental validation showed that the highest errors are related to low deposition time and current, which suggests that in such conditions arc efficiency significantly changes. Specifically, with trial-and-error variable arc efficiency values, the model showed accuracy with overall errors below 8% (i.e., calibrated accuracy). These findings demonstrate the model's utility for initial feasibility assessment via a priori estimates, while highlighting the necessity of calibrated efficiency for precise toolpath generation and process repeatability.

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
University of Florence (IT)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.