Adaptive Structural Productivity Modeling and Analytics for Software Projects

Productivity evaluation in industrial software projects is still predominantly based on aggregate Function Point-to-effort ratios. Such an approach overlooks the internal structural and functional heterogeneity of software projects, potentially leading to misleading comparisons between systems characterized by similar functional sizes but markedly different structural complexities. This work investigates the hypothesis that projects with similar functional structures, within the same application domain, tend to exhibit comparable productivity behavior. For this purpose, an adaptive and structurally informed productivity assessment approach is proposed, based on a Structural Productivity Index that integrates domain-specific productivity information with project functional composition. The proposed model is validated through real-world and synthetic project datasets, combined with consistency indicators and clustering-based analyses to examine its behavior under different conditions and its capability to distinguish regular productivity patterns from structurally anomalous projects. Experimental results suggest that the proposed adaptive productivity modeling approach provides a more coherent interpretation of productivity estimates compared with traditional productivity metrics. The proposed structural representation provides an interpretable basis for future AI-based productivity analytics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16189000
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptive Structural Productivity Modeling and Analytics for Software Projects

Maria Luisa Villani, Claudio Antonelli
Applied Sciences
Software Engineering Research
article

Adaptive Structural Productivity Modeling and Analytics for Software Projects

Maria Luisa Villani, Claudio Antonelli
article en

Abstract

Productivity evaluation in industrial software projects is still predominantly based on aggregate Function Point-to-effort ratios. Such an approach overlooks the internal structural and functional heterogeneity of software projects, potentially leading to misleading comparisons between systems characterized by similar functional sizes but markedly different structural complexities. This work investigates the hypothesis that projects with similar functional structures, within the same application domain, tend to exhibit comparable productivity behavior. For this purpose, an adaptive and structurally informed productivity assessment approach is proposed, based on a Structural Productivity Index that integrates domain-specific productivity information with project functional composition. The proposed model is validated through real-world and synthetic project datasets, combined with consistency indicators and clustering-based analyses to examine its behavior under different conditions and its capability to distinguish regular productivity patterns from structurally anomalous projects. Experimental results suggest that the proposed adaptive productivity modeling approach provides a more coherent interpretation of productivity estimates compared with traditional productivity metrics. The proposed structural representation provides an interpretable basis for future AI-based productivity analytics.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(18)
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT), Marconi University (IT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Software Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.