Management of Soft Tissue and Visceral Leiomyosarcomas

Importance Leiomyosarcoma is a rare and heterogeneous malignant mesenchymal neoplasm associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Given recent advances in biologic understanding and the complexity of leiomyosarcoma, a consensus-driven approach is needed to harmonize management and address remaining clinical and research gaps. Objective To provide an evidence-based synthesis of current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for leiomyosarcoma by an international panel of physicians, researchers, and patient advocates, focusing on site-specific management, systemic therapy strategies, and key areas of clinical uncertainty, while identifying unmet needs and research priorities. Evidence Review This review is based on a comprehensive evaluation of the literature, including clinical trials, observational studies, and international consensus guidelines. Sources were identified through MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Embase database searches and reference screening, then supplemented by multidisciplinary expert consensus. Emphasis was placed on studies informing diagnosis, surgical management, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy in leiomyosarcoma. Findings The rarity and heterogeneity of leiomyosarcoma poses substantial challenges in its management. In localized disease, complete surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment, with evidence supporting the use of site-specific perioperative treatment strategies. Prospective data supporting neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy are lacking, and the role of radiotherapy differs across anatomic disease sites and institutions. In advanced disease, multiple systemic therapies demonstrate activity, including anthracycline-based and gemcitabine-based combinations, trabectedin, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, although optimal sequencing after first-line therapy remains undefined. Emerging data suggest potential benefit from treatment continuation strategies and selected use of local therapies in oligometastatic settings. Molecular heterogeneity is increasingly recognized but has not yet translated into routine clinical implementation, and integration of molecular profiling into diagnostic pathways for predictive and therapeutic insights remains an unmet need. Conclusions and Relevance This international consensus addresses the diagnosis and management of leiomyosarcoma. Management requires a multidisciplinary, site-specific approach informed by limited but evolving evidence. Key uncertainties persist, particularly regarding perioperative therapy, optimal sequencing and combination of systemic treatments, and integration of molecular data. Continued international collaboration and leiomyosarcoma-specific clinical trials are needed to refine treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Oncology
Published
2026-09-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2026.3366
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Management of Soft Tissue and Visceral Leiomyosarcomas

Ryan Denu, Chiara Fabbroni, Kathrin Schuster, Annie Achee et al.
JAMA Oncology
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Management of Soft Tissue and Visceral Leiomyosarcomas

Ryan Denu, Chiara Fabbroni, Kathrin Schuster, Annie Achee, G. van Oortmerssen, Frédéric Amant, Kenneth Cardona, Joanna Przybył, Alessandra Maleddu, Peter Reichardt, Alexander J. Lazar, Lorenzo D’Ambrosio, Tom Wei‐Wu Chen, Chandrajit P. Raut, Silvia Stacchiotti, Sujana Movva, Scott Schuetze, J. Carlson, Bernd Kasper, Priya Chudasama, Emanuela Palmerini, Rebecca Gladdy, Robin L. Jones, F. B. Campos, Angelo P. Dei Tos, Denise Reinke, Robert Maki, Aisha B. Miah, Gina D'Amato, Roberta Sanfilippo, Giovanni Grignani, Scott Okuno, Matthew L. Hemming, Dale Shepard, B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo, Paul Huang, Winan van Houdt, Sameer Rastogi, Elise Nassif Haddad, Jeffrey Tsao, Leiomyosarcoma Global Consensus Group, Javier Martin-Broto, Patrick Schöffski, Albiruni Abdul Razak, Josephine K. Dermawan, Paul Savage, Mitch Achee, Alessandro Gronchi, Elizabeth A. Connolly
article en

Abstract

Importance Leiomyosarcoma is a rare and heterogeneous malignant mesenchymal neoplasm associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Given recent advances in biologic understanding and the complexity of leiomyosarcoma, a consensus-driven approach is needed to harmonize management and address remaining clinical and research gaps. Objective To provide an evidence-based synthesis of current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for leiomyosarcoma by an international panel of physicians, researchers, and patient advocates, focusing on site-specific management, systemic therapy strategies, and key areas of clinical uncertainty, while identifying unmet needs and research priorities. Evidence Review This review is based on a comprehensive evaluation of the literature, including clinical trials, observational studies, and international consensus guidelines. Sources were identified through MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Embase database searches and reference screening, then supplemented by multidisciplinary expert consensus. Emphasis was placed on studies informing diagnosis, surgical management, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy in leiomyosarcoma. Findings The rarity and heterogeneity of leiomyosarcoma poses substantial challenges in its management. In localized disease, complete surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment, with evidence supporting the use of site-specific perioperative treatment strategies. Prospective data supporting neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy are lacking, and the role of radiotherapy differs across anatomic disease sites and institutions. In advanced disease, multiple systemic therapies demonstrate activity, including anthracycline-based and gemcitabine-based combinations, trabectedin, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, although optimal sequencing after first-line therapy remains undefined. Emerging data suggest potential benefit from treatment continuation strategies and selected use of local therapies in oligometastatic settings. Molecular heterogeneity is increasingly recognized but has not yet translated into routine clinical implementation, and integration of molecular profiling into diagnostic pathways for predictive and therapeutic insights remains an unmet need. Conclusions and Relevance This international consensus addresses the diagnosis and management of leiomyosarcoma. Management requires a multidisciplinary, site-specific approach informed by limited but evolving evidence. Key uncertainties persist, particularly regarding perioperative therapy, optimal sequencing and combination of systemic treatments, and integration of molecular data. Continued international collaboration and leiomyosarcoma-specific clinical trials are needed to refine treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes.

JAMA Oncology
Mount Sinai Hospital (CA), The University of Sydney (AU), Cleveland Clinic (US), Mayo Clinic (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of Padua (IT), Institute of Cancer Research (GB), Children's Medical Research Institute (AU), Emory University (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), AC Camargo Hospital (BR), ConsenSys (United States) (US), Foundation for Ichthyosis and Related Skin Types (US), City of Hope (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Royal Marsden Hospital (GB), Sinai Health System (CA), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), Global Cancer Institute (US), Molecular Networks (Germany) (DE), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University Medical Centre Mannheim (DE), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), Winship Cancer Institute, McGill University (CA), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), European Institute of Oncology (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.