The Arabic Version of the Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation

Background: Evaluating subjective rhinoplasty outcomes requires valid patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty is a concise 5-item tool incorporating a visual analog scale (VAS). The authors report the cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of its Arabic version (A-OAR). Materials and Methods: Following standardized forward-backward translation, the A-OAR was administered prospectively to 121 participants: 51 rhinoplasty patients (assessed preoperatively, and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively) and 70 healthy controls with comparable age and gender distributions (tested twice, 2–4 weeks apart). Psychometric evaluation included internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)], absolute reliability [standard error of measurement (SEM); minimal detectable change (MDC95)], convergent validity, discriminative validity, structural validity [exploratory factor analysis (EFA)], floor/ceiling effects, and responsiveness [standardized response mean (SRM)]. Results: Internal consistency was high (preoperative α=0.882; 3-mo α=0.932), alongside strong test-retest reliability (ICC=0.830). SEM and MDC 95 were 0.959 and 2.658, respectively. Convergent validity with the VAS was confirmed ( P <0.002). The A-OAR discriminated effectively between patients and controls ( P <0.001). EFA revealed a unidimensional structure explaining 82.9% of total variance and strong factor loadings (0.867–0.952). No significant floor or ceiling effects occurred at baseline. Longitudinally, scores improved significantly across all parameters ( P <0.001). The sum score SRM increased from 0.92 at 1 month to 1.08 at 3 months, indicating excellent responsiveness. Conclusion: The A-OAR is a reliable, valid, and highly responsive PROM, fully optimized for evaluating aesthetic rhinoplasty outcomes in Arabic-speaking populations across clinical and research settings

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000013369
Primary Topic
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Arabic Version of the Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation

Hadeel Abdulrahman Aljoufi, Abdulaziz Alshehri, Mohammed Jomah, Abdulmoniem MJ Alshwareb
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
article

The Arabic Version of the Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation

Hadeel Abdulrahman Aljoufi, Abdulaziz Alshehri, Mohammed Jomah, Abdulmoniem MJ Alshwareb
article en

Abstract

Background: Evaluating subjective rhinoplasty outcomes requires valid patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty is a concise 5-item tool incorporating a visual analog scale (VAS). The authors report the cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of its Arabic version (A-OAR). Materials and Methods: Following standardized forward-backward translation, the A-OAR was administered prospectively to 121 participants: 51 rhinoplasty patients (assessed preoperatively, and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively) and 70 healthy controls with comparable age and gender distributions (tested twice, 2–4 weeks apart). Psychometric evaluation included internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)], absolute reliability [standard error of measurement (SEM); minimal detectable change (MDC95)], convergent validity, discriminative validity, structural validity [exploratory factor analysis (EFA)], floor/ceiling effects, and responsiveness [standardized response mean (SRM)]. Results: Internal consistency was high (preoperative α=0.882; 3-mo α=0.932), alongside strong test-retest reliability (ICC=0.830). SEM and MDC 95 were 0.959 and 2.658, respectively. Convergent validity with the VAS was confirmed ( P <0.002). The A-OAR discriminated effectively between patients and controls ( P <0.001). EFA revealed a unidimensional structure explaining 82.9% of total variance and strong factor loadings (0.867–0.952). No significant floor or ceiling effects occurred at baseline. Longitudinally, scores improved significantly across all parameters ( P <0.001). The sum score SRM increased from 0.92 at 1 month to 1.08 at 3 months, indicating excellent responsiveness. Conclusion: The A-OAR is a reliable, valid, and highly responsive PROM, fully optimized for evaluating aesthetic rhinoplasty outcomes in Arabic-speaking populations across clinical and research settings

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Jouf University (SA), King Saud University (SA), King Fahad Hospital Jeddah (SA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.