A Better Deal for Data: Model Commitments to Unlock Data in the Nonprofit Sector

Abstract Nonprofits face persistent challenges in using data for program evaluation, research, and impact assessment, while simultaneously managing sensitive information about the communities they serve. Existing data governance frameworks have largely been developed for commercial or institutional contexts and are poorly suited to the organizational structures, capacity constraints, and mission-driven priorities of most nonprofits. More resource-intensive approaches, such as data trusts, have robust data governance but involve overhead costs that make them inaccessible to much of the nonprofit sector. Through a review of data governance literature and outreach to nonprofit stakeholders, we identify a gap in practically available tools for responsibly governing non-public data: data that cannot be made fully open. We propose the Better Deal for Data (BD4D), a lightweight framework of standardized commitments to ethical data stewardship modeled on the approach taken by open source software licenses and Creative Commons frameworks. The BD4D commitments address key barriers including declining trust in data sharing and the absence of consistent governance norms. By fostering sector-wide adoption, we aim to unlock vital non-open data for impact and research while promoting a culture of trust and ethical data stewardship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit Policy Forum
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2025-0019
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Better Deal for Data: Model Commitments to Unlock Data in the Nonprofit Sector

Katy McKinney-Bock, Steve Francis, Jim Fruchterman
Nonprofit Policy Forum
Research Data Management Practices
article

A Better Deal for Data: Model Commitments to Unlock Data in the Nonprofit Sector

Katy McKinney-Bock, Steve Francis, Jim Fruchterman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Nonprofits face persistent challenges in using data for program evaluation, research, and impact assessment, while simultaneously managing sensitive information about the communities they serve. Existing data governance frameworks have largely been developed for commercial or institutional contexts and are poorly suited to the organizational structures, capacity constraints, and mission-driven priorities of most nonprofits. More resource-intensive approaches, such as data trusts, have robust data governance but involve overhead costs that make them inaccessible to much of the nonprofit sector. Through a review of data governance literature and outreach to nonprofit stakeholders, we identify a gap in practically available tools for responsibly governing non-public data: data that cannot be made fully open. We propose the Better Deal for Data (BD4D), a lightweight framework of standardized commitments to ethical data stewardship modeled on the approach taken by open source software licenses and Creative Commons frameworks. The BD4D commitments address key barriers including declining trust in data sharing and the absence of consistent governance norms. By fostering sector-wide adoption, we aim to unlock vital non-open data for impact and research while promoting a culture of trust and ethical data stewardship.

Nonprofit Policy Forum
Palo Alto Research Center (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.