Open Data in educational research: Possibilities, challenges, and reflections

Abstract Open Data is an essential practice within the Open Science movement and is increasingly addressed in research policy and journal guidelines. However, its adoption in educational research remains limited. We show that the prevalence of Open Data in four key German-language educational research journals is indeed limited (5.84% between 2020 and 2024). Accordingly, we argue that educational research should debate Open Data more openly. The aim of this article is therefore to inform researchers on Open Data to stimulate that debate. To this end, we situate Open Data within the specific epistemological, methodological, and ethical context of educational research and assess its potential and limitations. We discuss key dimensions relevant to evaluating Open Data, including differentiated access models, licensing options, FAIR principles, infrastructural requirements, and challenges associated with qualitative data. Against this background, arguments in favour of Open Data—such as cumulative knowledge building, transparency, and efficiency—are contrasted with potential unintended consequences, including methodological risks, epistemological tensions, interactions with publication practices, and implications for research pluralism. Drawing on the literature and reflective considerations, we put forward a nuanced position in which Open Data is a valuable Open Science practice in educational research, while emphasizing the need for context-sensitive, ethically grounded, and voluntary implementation rather than uniform mandates.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s35834-026-00565-1
Primary Topic
Data Analysis and Archiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Open Data in educational research: Possibilities, challenges, and reflections

Georg Krammer, Erich Svecnik
Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung
Data Analysis and Archiving
article

Open Data in educational research: Possibilities, challenges, and reflections

Georg Krammer, Erich Svecnik
article en

Abstract

Abstract Open Data is an essential practice within the Open Science movement and is increasingly addressed in research policy and journal guidelines. However, its adoption in educational research remains limited. We show that the prevalence of Open Data in four key German-language educational research journals is indeed limited (5.84% between 2020 and 2024). Accordingly, we argue that educational research should debate Open Data more openly. The aim of this article is therefore to inform researchers on Open Data to stimulate that debate. To this end, we situate Open Data within the specific epistemological, methodological, and ethical context of educational research and assess its potential and limitations. We discuss key dimensions relevant to evaluating Open Data, including differentiated access models, licensing options, FAIR principles, infrastructural requirements, and challenges associated with qualitative data. Against this background, arguments in favour of Open Data—such as cumulative knowledge building, transparency, and efficiency—are contrasted with potential unintended consequences, including methodological risks, epistemological tensions, interactions with publication practices, and implications for research pluralism. Drawing on the literature and reflective considerations, we put forward a nuanced position in which Open Data is a valuable Open Science practice in educational research, while emphasizing the need for context-sensitive, ethically grounded, and voluntary implementation rather than uniform mandates.

Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Data Analysis and Archiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.