Fostering trust: a dialogic framework for student reference groups in higher education research

Universities often rely on student advisory and consultative structures to inform research and educational change. Yet the relational conditions that enable students to meaningfully contribute within asymmetrical staff–student relationships remain undertheorised. Drawing on relationship management and dialogic theories, this paper proposes a Principled Dialogic Trust Framework for fostering trust within these relationships. The framework comprises six relational principles: mutuality, empathy, commitment, risk, relational proximity and transparency, through which trust can deliberately be fostered when authority is not equally distributed. An illustrative case study demonstrates how these principles were enacted across a five-stage blended learning redesign project, in which non-traditional students contributed as advisors from their experiential knowledge and insight. The paper argues that trust functions not as an outcome of successful engagement, but as a relational antecedent that enables students to meaningfully contribute within staff-led initiatives. The framework extends existing dialogic and relationship management traditions to higher education, addressing participatory structures where power asymmetry is constitutive rather than incidental.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2026.2728953
Primary Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fostering trust: a dialogic framework for student reference groups in higher education research

Prudence Millear, Karen E. Sutherland, Sherelle Norman, Alison L. Black et al.
Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
article

Fostering trust: a dialogic framework for student reference groups in higher education research

Prudence Millear, Karen E. Sutherland, Sherelle Norman, Alison L. Black, Terri Downer, Ginna Brock, Nicole Masters, Margarietha de Villiers Scheepers, Timothy Strohfeldt
article en

Abstract

Universities often rely on student advisory and consultative structures to inform research and educational change. Yet the relational conditions that enable students to meaningfully contribute within asymmetrical staff–student relationships remain undertheorised. Drawing on relationship management and dialogic theories, this paper proposes a Principled Dialogic Trust Framework for fostering trust within these relationships. The framework comprises six relational principles: mutuality, empathy, commitment, risk, relational proximity and transparency, through which trust can deliberately be fostered when authority is not equally distributed. An illustrative case study demonstrates how these principles were enacted across a five-stage blended learning redesign project, in which non-traditional students contributed as advisors from their experiential knowledge and insight. The paper argues that trust functions not as an outcome of successful engagement, but as a relational antecedent that enables students to meaningfully contribute within staff-led initiatives. The framework extends existing dialogic and relationship management traditions to higher education, addressing participatory structures where power asymmetry is constitutive rather than incidental.

Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
University of the Sunshine Coast (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.