Artificial Intelligence in Indian Dermatology: An IADVL Academy Position Statement and Policy Framework for Safe, Equitable, and Effective Adoption

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) systems, particularly deep learning models, are increasingly used in dermatology for image analysis, triage, remote monitoring, and decision support. For real-world adoption in the Indian dermatology ecosystem, robust validation, transparency, and governance are essential to protect patient safety and equity. This position statement synthesizes guidance from international dermatology societies and major regulatory approaches, and proposes India-adapted recommendations across clinical use, dataset curation, validation standards, ethics, privacy, liability, and policy. We performed a narrative synthesis of position statements from the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), British Association of Dermatologists (BAD), and Australasian College of Dermatologists (ACD); regulatory frameworks, including the European Union Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR), the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) approach, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) evidence standards, and Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). Indian frameworks, including the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) Medical Device Rules, Bureau of Indian Standards/International Organization for Standardization (BIS/ISO) standards, the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, and Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) artificial intelligence ethics guidance were included. Seven domains were analyzed: governance, evidence generation, data bias, clinical safety, privacy, liability, and education. Principles emphasize clinician-in-the-loop use, prospective multicentric validation in representative Indian settings, skin-of-color inclusivity, transparent labeling and explainability, post-market surveillance, and clearer accountability. While clinical utility and health-economic evidence remain limited, validated and inclusive AI tools can responsibly expand access to quality dermatologic care in India, particularly in underserved areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Dermatology Online Journal
Published
2026-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.idoj_1250_25
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Artificial Intelligence in Indian Dermatology: An IADVL Academy Position Statement and Policy Framework for Safe, Equitable, and Effective Adoption

Bushra Khan, Somesh Gupta, Monisha Madhumita, Senkadhir Vendhan et al.
Indian Dermatology Online Journal
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Artificial Intelligence in Indian Dermatology: An IADVL Academy Position Statement and Policy Framework for Safe, Equitable, and Effective Adoption

Bushra Khan, Somesh Gupta, Monisha Madhumita, Senkadhir Vendhan, Shital Poojary, Siddharth Bhatt
article en

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) systems, particularly deep learning models, are increasingly used in dermatology for image analysis, triage, remote monitoring, and decision support. For real-world adoption in the Indian dermatology ecosystem, robust validation, transparency, and governance are essential to protect patient safety and equity. This position statement synthesizes guidance from international dermatology societies and major regulatory approaches, and proposes India-adapted recommendations across clinical use, dataset curation, validation standards, ethics, privacy, liability, and policy. We performed a narrative synthesis of position statements from the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), British Association of Dermatologists (BAD), and Australasian College of Dermatologists (ACD); regulatory frameworks, including the European Union Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR), the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) approach, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) evidence standards, and Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). Indian frameworks, including the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) Medical Device Rules, Bureau of Indian Standards/International Organization for Standardization (BIS/ISO) standards, the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, and Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) artificial intelligence ethics guidance were included. Seven domains were analyzed: governance, evidence generation, data bias, clinical safety, privacy, liability, and education. Principles emphasize clinician-in-the-loop use, prospective multicentric validation in representative Indian settings, skin-of-color inclusivity, transparent labeling and explainability, post-market surveillance, and clearer accountability. While clinical utility and health-economic evidence remain limited, validated and inclusive AI tools can responsibly expand access to quality dermatologic care in India, particularly in underserved areas.

Indian Dermatology Online Journal
Government Medical College (IN), Indian Navy (IN), South Eastern Railway (IN), Government Medical College and Hospital (IN), K J Somaiya Medical College (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.