Podcasting in Nursing and Midwifery Education and Continuing Professional Development: A Scoping Review

Background: Digital innovations have transformed health professions education, with podcasting emerging as a flexible, learner-centered educational modality. Podcasts support asynchronous, mobile, and self-directed learning, enabling access to educational content beyond traditional classroom environments. However, evidence regarding their effectiveness, integration strategies, and impact on educational and practice outcomes remains fragmented. Aim/Objective: This review aimed to map the existing literature on the use of podcasting in nursing and midwifery education and continuing professional development (CPD), identify how podcasts are used, summarize reported benefits and limitations, and highlight gaps for future research. Design: Scoping review. Methods: A scoping review was conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Eligibility criteria were developed using the Population–Concept–Context (PCC) framework to define the review scope. A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, Google Scholar, ProQuest, and OpenGrey to identify studies published in English between January 2005 and December 2024. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles against the predefined eligibility criteria. Data were extracted using a standardized charting form, and the included studies were synthesized using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis to map the characteristics and educational applications. They reported outcomes of podcasting in nursing and midwifery education. Results: Twenty-four studies were included. Podcasting was associated with enhanced learning flexibility, learner engagement, and knowledge retention in both academic and CPD contexts. It supported asynchronous and self-directed learning while reinforcing key concepts. Challenges included variable content quality, limited integration of assessment, and scarce evidence linking podcast use to clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Podcasting is a promising adjunct to nursing and midwifery education and CPD. Formal integration into curricula and professional development frameworks is recommended. Further research should focus on longitudinal outcomes, low- and middle-income settings, and impacts on clinical practice and interprofessional learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14182916
Primary Topic
Innovations in Educational Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Podcasting in Nursing and Midwifery Education and Continuing Professional Development: A Scoping Review

Jibin Kunjavara, R. Mathew, Mahmoud Abdelwahab Khedr, Abdulqadir J. J. Nashwan et al.
Healthcare
Innovations in Educational Methods
article

Podcasting in Nursing and Midwifery Education and Continuing Professional Development: A Scoping Review

Jibin Kunjavara, R. Mathew, Mahmoud Abdelwahab Khedr, Abdulqadir J. J. Nashwan, Anas Khalifeh, Yasmine M. Osman, Fadwa Al-halaiqa
article en

Abstract

Background: Digital innovations have transformed health professions education, with podcasting emerging as a flexible, learner-centered educational modality. Podcasts support asynchronous, mobile, and self-directed learning, enabling access to educational content beyond traditional classroom environments. However, evidence regarding their effectiveness, integration strategies, and impact on educational and practice outcomes remains fragmented. Aim/Objective: This review aimed to map the existing literature on the use of podcasting in nursing and midwifery education and continuing professional development (CPD), identify how podcasts are used, summarize reported benefits and limitations, and highlight gaps for future research. Design: Scoping review. Methods: A scoping review was conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Eligibility criteria were developed using the Population–Concept–Context (PCC) framework to define the review scope. A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, Google Scholar, ProQuest, and OpenGrey to identify studies published in English between January 2005 and December 2024. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles against the predefined eligibility criteria. Data were extracted using a standardized charting form, and the included studies were synthesized using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis to map the characteristics and educational applications. They reported outcomes of podcasting in nursing and midwifery education. Results: Twenty-four studies were included. Podcasting was associated with enhanced learning flexibility, learner engagement, and knowledge retention in both academic and CPD contexts. It supported asynchronous and self-directed learning while reinforcing key concepts. Challenges included variable content quality, limited integration of assessment, and scarce evidence linking podcast use to clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Podcasting is a promising adjunct to nursing and midwifery education and CPD. Formal integration into curricula and professional development frameworks is recommended. Further research should focus on longitudinal outcomes, low- and middle-income settings, and impacts on clinical practice and interprofessional learning.

HealthcareVol. 14(18)
Zarqa University (JO), Ajman University (AE), Zagazig University (EG), Hamad Medical Corporation (QA), Qatar University (QA), Alexandria University (EG)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Innovations in Educational Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.