A roadmap for organization-wide implementation of evidence-based medicine: an overview of reviews.

AIMS: The aim of this overview is to provide a roadmap for the organization-wide implementation of evidence-based medicine (EBM) by synthesizing evidence across three key implementation process steps: outcome measurement, contextual analysis, and strategy selection. METHODS: A systematic overview of reviews was conducted following an a priori protocol (osf.io/65zn2). Reviews that provided information on EBM implementation, published from 2013 to 2023, were retrieved from MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCOhost). An implementation process model, a conceptual framework for organizational readiness, and a taxonomy for implementation strategies were used to synthesize the findings. RESULTS: The overview screened 8,726 reviews, of which 100 were included. Reviews related to outcome measurement (n = 50) all reported provider-level outcomes (e.g., knowledge and skills) and identified up to 204 instruments. Four instruments were consistently recommended: EBPQ, EPIC, Fresno Test, and HS-EBP. The results of reviews on contextual analysis (n = 57) were structured according to five Organizational Readiness concepts and 22 themes. Organizational (n = 51) and personal factors influencing EBM implementation (n = 48) were discussed most. Reviews reporting implementation strategies (n = 40) mainly investigated educational strategies (n = 38). Other strategies, such as infrastructure changes, were less commonly evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: This overview of reviews identifies actionable insights for the organization-wide implementation of EBM, including validated provider-level measurement instruments, a comprehensive overview of contextual factors, and effective strategies to support implementation. Critical evidence gaps concerned non-educational strategies as well as the assessment of organizational and patient-level outcomes. By connecting insights across all stages of the implementation process, our synthesis offers health care organizations a structured roadmap to design, implement, and evaluate sustainable EBM initiatives. SPANISH ABSTRACT: https://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A692.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000649
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A roadmap for organization-wide implementation of evidence-based medicine: an overview of reviews.

Dirk T. Ubbink, Pauline Heus, Maarten J. van der Laan, Kim van der Braak et al.
PubMed
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

A roadmap for organization-wide implementation of evidence-based medicine: an overview of reviews.

Dirk T. Ubbink, Pauline Heus, Maarten J. van der Laan, Kim van der Braak, Getty Huisman‐de Waal, Claudia Orelio, Lotty Hooft
article en

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this overview is to provide a roadmap for the organization-wide implementation of evidence-based medicine (EBM) by synthesizing evidence across three key implementation process steps: outcome measurement, contextual analysis, and strategy selection. METHODS: A systematic overview of reviews was conducted following an a priori protocol (osf.io/65zn2). Reviews that provided information on EBM implementation, published from 2013 to 2023, were retrieved from MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCOhost). An implementation process model, a conceptual framework for organizational readiness, and a taxonomy for implementation strategies were used to synthesize the findings. RESULTS: The overview screened 8,726 reviews, of which 100 were included. Reviews related to outcome measurement (n = 50) all reported provider-level outcomes (e.g., knowledge and skills) and identified up to 204 instruments. Four instruments were consistently recommended: EBPQ, EPIC, Fresno Test, and HS-EBP. The results of reviews on contextual analysis (n = 57) were structured according to five Organizational Readiness concepts and 22 themes. Organizational (n = 51) and personal factors influencing EBM implementation (n = 48) were discussed most. Reviews reporting implementation strategies (n = 40) mainly investigated educational strategies (n = 38). Other strategies, such as infrastructure changes, were less commonly evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: This overview of reviews identifies actionable insights for the organization-wide implementation of EBM, including validated provider-level measurement instruments, a comprehensive overview of contextual factors, and effective strategies to support implementation. Critical evidence gaps concerned non-educational strategies as well as the assessment of organizational and patient-level outcomes. By connecting insights across all stages of the implementation process, our synthesis offers health care organizations a structured roadmap to design, implement, and evaluate sustainable EBM initiatives. SPANISH ABSTRACT: https://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A692.

PubMed
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Diakonessenhuis hospital (NL), Netherlands Federation of University Medical Centres (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.